|
Post by jukka on Feb 13, 2008 14:08:33 GMT 2
these are two kirlian photos taken from fingerprints of same hand, left photo first and right side photo was taken after being surrounded with orgone-generators and using orgonite necklace and orgonites in both hands about ten-fifteen minutes. The brightness and width of aura can be seen quite clearly: bigger picture link: farm4.static.flickr.com/3283/2345227903_8df9bc66ec_b.jpg
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Sept 3, 2007 11:54:29 GMT 2
It is possible to charge water with all kinds of orgonite devices, generally the idea is to set the water on a energy vortex/orgone flow generated by orgonite. The intensity of the flow of energy is different depending what kind of device is used. One can use effectively even so small device as ´towerbuster` to orgonise water. The idea is to harmonise the crystalline structure of the water. Blessing with persons own energy is simplest way to do it, this is more effective when single crystal of salt (or some more if the amount of water is greater) is put into the water. I think that adding some salt is beneficial also when energizing water as very often the water coming from the tap is energetically death. or When using this kind of plate like above, for energizing the water i think it is very useful to make spiralling movement into the water with sthingy or whatever, as when the water is spiralling, its vibrational level rises and the temperature decreases. There are some ways to make energizing water more effective and one is to add some salt (in order to enchance the crystalline structure of water and add some minerals) and other very important is the spiralling movement. (this pictures were found with google pictures with ´water vortex`search word, click with right mousebutton on the pic and choose ´copy address of picture` to get the original address of picture)
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Apr 11, 2007 13:38:19 GMT 2
www.orgone-art.com/anglais/ve/contrelledexperiment.htmwww.quebecorgone.com/experimentreports/1.pdf First CONTROLLED experiment to demonstrate the effects of Orgone Energy on seed germination Problem: It is well-known and accepted, through empirical evidence and numerous user reports, that Orgone Energy such as the one output by Orgone Transmuting Devices generally known as "orgonite devices", affects plant growth in numerous beneficial ways. Quicker growth, added vitality and better resistance to pests and diseases are some of the effects reported by several independant researchers worldwide. However, no controlled experiment as been made yet (that we are aware of). My aim is to prove, and hopefully quantify these beneficial effects by running a serie of controlled experiments. Hypothesis: It is generally accepted that Orgone Energy is the Life Force which permeates all matter, and infuses life and consciousness to sentient, living beings. It is also generally accepted that an increased amount of beneficial Orgone Energy, described using the term "POR" (positive orgone) brings more vigor, vitality and consciousness to the organisms exposed to it. I suspect that by exposing live, germinating seeds to an increased amount of POR would in turn result in quicker seeds response, higher germination rate and overall increased vigor within the test groups. Protocol: I have constructed two Orgone Transmuting Devices for the purpose of this experiment. One unit was designed and assembled with specific ingredients which are suspected to beneficially affect plant growth (Paramagnetic rock dust and bio-enzymes). The second unit is a standard Orgone Transmuting Device known as an "HHG". This second unit features the exact same design and ingredients as the "large conical HHG" found on Quebec Orgone's catalog. This device is proven to work as is it intended to, namely to transmute DOR into POR. Countless user reports and empirical evidences act as irrefutable proof in this case. The first unit is an experimental device. It's effects, be it on plant growth or simply to transmute DOR into POR remain to be demonstrated. Both units contain the exact same amount of epoxy resin and metal (bronze and aluminium). I carefully weighted the bronze contained in each device prior to including it to make sure they both had the same "density". Unit 2 (standard HHG) has a slightly larger crystal as unit 1, but this should not affect performance as unit 1 contains an additional copper resonant cavity, filled with bio-enzymes and into which the crystal is inserted, and this assembly is roughly the same size as crystal in unit #2. I carefully weighted 3 GROUPS OF 50 GRAMS of white beans, taken from the supermarket. All 3 groups were made using the same bag of beans, and placed in 3 separate, but identical, plastic plates. I then added 30 GRAMS OF WATER to each test group. The water is tap water from the lab, which comes from a quality well. Group 1 has then been exposed to the experimental Orgone Transmuting Device. The device is placed within centimeters of the plate. Group 2 is a control group. It is unexposed. Group 3 has been exposed to the Standard HHG Orgone Transmuting Device. The device is, here again, placed within the same distance to the plate as group 1's unit. All 3 groups are placed 4 feet apart, to prevent the effects of Orgone Energy from affecting all 3 groups at once. I would have placed them further apart, but I wanted to minimize the variables, such as ley-line, shumann and other geopathic factors, from affecting the experiment. Environment: This experiment is ran in a basement, with constant temperature of 22 degrees C and 65% RH. All plates were deposited on the floor (cement). OBSERVATIONS: The weight results of this experiment are presented in the table below: Time Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 0hr 80g 80g 80g 14hr 74g 64g 68g ADDED 20 Grams of water 14hr 94g 84g 88g and covered the plates* 18hr 92g 82g 84g 24hr 92g 82g 84g 36hr 92g 82g 84g 60hr 92g 82g 84g 84hr 92g 80g 82g 100hr 90g 80g 82g 124hr 90g 80g 82g *Seeds were drying out
Visual evaluation and notes: @14hr: I was surprised to note that a few seeds had already germinated in all 3 groups. Group 1's growing sprouts seemed a bit longer, but it is premature at this time to even mention this. If it weren't for the obvious difference in weight, all three groups looked the same. It is strange to note that Group 1 and Group 3's evaporation rate seemed to have been considerably slower, OR the seeds themselves increased their mass comparing to the control group. Which of the two explanations is valid remains to be determined. @18hr: Visually, nothing changed. Some water evaporation seems to be happening again, despite having covered the plates. I guess I should replace the cardboard covering by something else. I'll do this now. It’s interesting to note that Group 3 appears to have lost more water to evaporation than both previous groups. This could be due to scale fluctuations. I definitely need to get a lab grade scale for future experiments. @24hr: No weight fluctuations can be observed. Likewise, there doesn’t appear to be much difference, visually. Group 3 seems to have quite a few more sprouts, but that’s about it. I’m guessing the next 24 hours will be much more interesting though. @36hr. Again, no weight differences to be noted. It is now obvious that the sprouting process is well started in all 3 groups though. Group 1 and 3 appear to have a bit more individual sprouts than group 2, but this observation is subjective as I didn’t count them individually. I suspect that, given the relatively small starting weight of all 3 groups, any weight gain cannot be measured adequately by the digital scale I’m using. A 0.1g graduated scale would be in order to register any difference at this point in time, I suspect. @60hr. There is, visually, virtually no difference between Group 1 and Group 2. Both groups appear to have the same number of sprouts, and their individual growth rate seems identical. As for Group 3, it seems to be lagging behind a little bit, to my greatest surprise. Could Orgone Energy be slowing down the first sprouting steps? The weights remain unchanged in all 3 groups. @84hr. These weight fluctuations mystify me. I was expecting a weight gain, not the opposite ;-) Group 2 and 3 both lost 2 grams each, while Group 1 remains unchanged. There is, visually, a noticeable difference now between Group 1 and the others. Group 1 has quite a few more individual sprouts, and these appear in fact to be growing faster than the ones in Group 2 and Group 3. The difference is minimal though, and one needs to look real close to really notice it.
@100hr. Visually, there is a major difference between Group 1 and the other 2. The sprouts are more numerous and much longer. But what attracted my attention this afternoon is the strong, disgusting, rotten odor coming from Group 2. It smells horrible, really. This odor is literally absent from Group 1. Group 3 does smell a little, but definitely not as much as Group 2! This is very interesting. It appears as if Orgone Energy slowed down (Group 3) or plain inhibited (Group 1) the formation and growth of bad bacteria. Group 1 finally lost 2 grams, just like the other 2 groups did @ 84hr. I’m looking forward to conclude this experiment in 48 hours from now! @124hr. Group 2 stinks! It’s horrible… A thin layer of gross jelly-like substance can be observed on the plate! Some seeds are covered with green fungal growth. Group 3 smell a little bit, but not nearly as much as Group 2! Group 1 is in great shape. It still smells fresh, albeit a faint rotten smell in the background that’s more like fruity, alcohol-like than anything else… It is now obvious that Group 1 sprouted much more individual seeds, while Group 3 has less than Group 1 but considerably more than Group 2. I estimate that over 60% of the seeds sprouted in Group 1. In Group 2, it appears more like 25- 30%, while Group 3 is more like 40-50%. Many sprouts in Group 1 already grew several roots out of the taproot. This also happened in Group 3, but only on a couple individual sprouts. This is definitely not the case in Group 2, where I only saw one. I will be ending this experiment prematurely right now, the smell is unbearable. CONCLUSION Not much can be concluded from looking at the weight measurement table, except the fact that Orgone Energy seemed to have slowed down the evaporation rate in the beginning, when the plates where left uncovered. I’m planning to obtain a lab-grade scale, with 0.1g increments, for future experiments. I’m hoping this will shed more light on the weight fluctuations observed. I’m suspecting that fungal and bacteria growth are closely related to these weight fluctuations. Future experiments will clear that out, hopefully. It is obvious to me that Orgone Energy affected in a positive way the sprouting process and early growth stages of both Group 1 and 3, although the effects were much more considerable on Group 1. This further indicates that orgone devices specifically constructed to influence vegetal life are superior, in that application, to standard orgone devices. Furthermore, this serves as validation that my new prototype, used on Group 1, is effective. While Orgone Energy obviously speeds up the growth process and clearly increased the germination rate of both Group 1 and 3, the most obvious effects where in the reduction of lifedestroying organisms such as fungus and bad bacteria. I’m wondering if this effect alone is responsible for the increased growth and higher germination rate, or if these increases are directly linked to being exposed to higher energy levels. This experiment serves to further validate that Orgone Transmuting Devices (orgonite) do in fact transmute DOR into POR, as can be seen by the drastic reduction of organisms feeding on DOR. I can objectively conclude that Orgone Energy has a definite, observable effect on seed germination. This effect could be quantified as a 200% increase in germination, in the best case, that is comparing Group 1 to the control group. Using a standard orgonite device, not specifically constructed to affect vegetal life, this increase can be evaluated at 100%. ADDITIONAL NOTES: This experiment was conducted in August 2005 at Quebec Orgone research and development center, in St-Hippolyte, Canada. Reproduction and distribution of this document is permitted, as long as its content is left intact with no modifications whatsoever. If you would like to repeat this experiment, or a variant of it, PLEASE DO SO. It would be kind of you to share your results with us at steeve@quebecorgone.com so we can keep on documenting the research being conducting within this fascinating world of Orgone Energy. The devices used for this experiment are available for sale* at www.quebecorgone.com We encourage you to build your own, however you may want to obtain them ready-made from us. This helps us pursue these researches and go forward. * At the time of this writing (August 10th, 2005), the experimental unit used on Group 1 is NOT YET available for sale as we intend to test it further before putting it on the market. It will then be marketed as “Vegetal HHG”. Check our catalog for details.
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Dec 11, 2007 13:37:54 GMT 2
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Aug 20, 2007 9:36:04 GMT 2
Viktor Schauberger was a man with a vision of better world and he learned from the nature itself and concluded that instead of explosive technology we would be so much better to use implosion as the source for energy. He showed that it is possibly to generate energy for free and purify nature, air and water and all with totally natural way. this site has information about Viktor Schauberger and some of his ideas represented well: www.frank.germano.com/viktorschauberger.htmwww.frank.germano.com/vortexscience.htm
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Apr 19, 2007 13:16:02 GMT 2
Hei, Tässä hyvä linkki ja muutamia kirjoja jotka voivat kiinnostaa ja jotka varmasti sisältävät paljon tärkeää tietoa: sahkoailmassa.fiwww.sahkoailmassa.fi/artikkelit.html------------------------------ www.sahkoailmassa.fi/kirjallisuus.html www.sahkoailmassa.fi/docs/kansikuvasivu.htmkuvat ja tekstit ylläolevasta osoitteesta: Sähköä ilmassa -tietokirja on ensimmäinen laatuaan Suomessa. Kirjoittajat tiedottaja Erja Tamminen, arkkitehti Päivi Rekula sekä sähkötekniikan DI Matti Juusela kertovat, miten sähköympäristömme on muuttunut ja miten se useiden tutkimusten mukaan vaikuttaa elimistöömme. Asia on erityisen tärkeä nostaa esiin Suomen kaltaisessa vahvan teknologian maassa. Kuka määrittelee käytettävän tekniikan ja turvallisuusnormit ja miltä pohjalta? Sähkösaneeraus on kestävän kehityksen mukainen strategia, jonka avulla pyritään suojaamaan ihmisiä uuden teknologian haitoilta. Käytännön esimerkit asuin- ja työpaikkakohteista Ruotsissa ja Suomessa valaisevat jo olemassa olevia mahdollisuuksia vaikuttaa ihmisten hyvinvointiin ja rakentamisen laatuun. Tapauskertomukset osoittavat, että nykyolosuhteissa nuoretkin voivat herkistyä sähkömagneettiselle säteilylle. Tässä kirjan toisessa päivitetyssä painoksessa useat lääkärit kantavat huolta kehityksen suunnasta. "Toivoisin, että sähköympäristön ongelmiin kiinnitettäisiin enemmän huomiota. Minulla on paljon kokemusta potilaista, jotka reagoivat sähkömagneettisille kentille. Tällaisiin potilaisiin törmää vastaanotolla yllättävän usein. Sähköä ilmassa -kirja antaa ongelmasta monipuolista tietoa", toteaa hammaslääkäri Riitta Linko. "Kirja herättää paljon ajatuksia asioista, joista tiedämme lääketieteessä varsin vähän. Jo pelkästään tämän takia pidän tällaista kirjaa tarpeellisena ja hyödyllisenä. Kirja on mielestäni hyvä ja asiallinen päänavaus sähköongelmista käytävälle keskustelulle", kommentoi fysiatrian ylilääkäri Jukka-Pekka Kouri. Muutokset politiikassa, tieteessä ja tekniikassa ovat jälleen tarpeen ja odottavat tekijöitään. katso kirjan sisällysluettelo: www.sahkoailmassa.fi/docs/esittely.htmKirjaa on saatavissa hyvin varustetuista kirjakaupoista hintaan 30 €. Myös suoraan Erja Tammiselta: erja.tamminen@jippii.fi p. 09-291 8696 ,.--.,,.--.,.,--.,,.- www.sahkoailmassa.fi/docs/ihmiskunta.htmlIHMISKUNTA JA LANGATON PELI on ilmestynyt Ruotsissa nimellä "Spelet om 3G" ja herättänyt vilkasta keskustelua. Kirjoittaja Mona Nilssonia on haastateltu TV:ssä. Tämä kirja kertoo myös Suomesta. Molemmissa maissa kansantalouksia rakennetaan "yhden kortin" varaan. Päällekkäisten langattomien teknologioiden terveysvaikutuksia ei ole lainkaan ennalta tutkittu. Tästä huolimatta Suomi katetaan päästä varpaisiin langattomilla verkkojärjestelmillä. Viranomaiset eivät valvo kokonaissäteilyn määrää. Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettelyä ei ole tehty. Kirja perustuu tutkittuun tietoon riskeistä. Riippumattomat tutkijat saavat todeta, että rahahanat sulkeutuvat, kun he julkaisevat teollisuudelle vahingollisia tuloksia. Tieteellisten tutkimusten arviointi osoittautuu yksisilmäiseksi. Samat ihmiset ovat ankkuroituneet kansainvälisiin päättäviin elimiin. Onko turvastandardeja suosittava ICNIRP riippumaton elin? Veteleekö teollisuus WHO:nkin naruista? "Kun EU:ssa laadittiin 1990-luvun lopulla suosituksia sähkömagneettisen säteilyn raja-arvoksi, Suomi kavahti sitoutumista varovaisuusperiaatteeseen. Varovaisuusperiaate merkitsisi sen tunnustamista, että tutkimuksin ei ole voitu sulkea pois pitkäaikaisten terveysvaikutusten olemassaoloa, pikemminkin päinvastoin. Monissa maissa, kuten Sveitsissä ja Britanniassa tämä on otettu vakavasti ja juuri lasten altistumista säteilylle on rajoitettu. Suomessa, Nokian kotimaassa, tämän on katsottu vahingoittavan langattoman viestinnän kehitystä. Kansalaiset ovat tästä oikeutetusti huolissaan ja heillä pitää myös olla oikeus vaikuttaa esim. tukiasemien sijoittumiseen elinympäristöönsä. Viranomaisten olisi perustettava julkinen rekisteri, josta jokainen saisi halutessaan nämä tiedot. Riskien kieltäminen voi johtaa suuriin ongelmiin tulevaisuudessa." Kansanedustaja Heidi Hautala ,.--.,,.--.,,.--.,,.--.,,.--.,,.-,.- Englanninkielinen kirja aiheesta; www.sahkoailmassa.fi/docs/gunni_abstract.htmThe Invisible Disease The Dangers of Environmental Illnesses caused by Electromagnetic Fields and Chemical Emissions. Author of the book: Gunni Nordström, journalist, Sweden Published by O´books, John Hunt-Publishing Ltd, 46 a West Street, New Alresford, Hampshire S0249AU, UK, 2004 Tel: 00 44 1962 736880 E-mail: office@johnhunt-publishing.com As a Swedish trade union-journalist I have followed the phenomenon called electro-hypersensitivity since 1985. Before my first article about skin problems among people who worked in front of computers there had been no debate about this question in Sweden, although many persons had claimed that they got eye and skin problems and other symptoms from using computers as early as the l970s. Physicians, however, said that it was not possible to get any such problems from being in front of computers. When it became known that a histopathologist, Björn Lagerholm at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, had seen that even very young computer-users had skin changes of a type that usually appears as a result of X-rays and over exposure to UV-light the debate started. Some young executives in their twenties looked as if they had worked as fishermen or farmers out in the sun for 60-70 years. Nobody claimed that Björn Lagerholm was wrong but the authorities and experts declared that the radiation from the computers could not be the reason for the skin changes. Nobody suggested that it could be a question of a combined effect of chemicals in the electronic devices and electromagnetic radiation in form of UV-light and electromagnetic fields. Nobody thought of this until 1990 when an engineer, Per Hedemalm, MSc, suggested that the mechanism could be the same as that causing chronic light sensitivity, an illness known for decades. Light sensitivity appears in many forms and is a result of a combination of chemicals and electromagnetic radiation, usually UV-light but sometimes visible light. Sensitivity to light and an increasing sensibility to various chemicals belong to the typical symptoms among electro-hypersensitive people but also among other groups as they affected by multiple chemical sensitivity and chronic fatigue. In my book I have interviewed Dr Joe LaDou, Division of Occupational Medicine at the University of California in San Fransisco. He has followed the health problems in the so called clean rooms in the microelectronic industry in Silicon Valley during many decades. He is convinced that the chemicals used in this industry give a lot of health problems. In my book I draw the line from the microelectronics manufacturing industry to the electronic waste disposal via the normal use of electronic devices in workplaces and homes. Micro-electronic devices, for example computers and mobil phones, emit chemicals all the time. In the case of computers this fact was admitted by IBM as early as 1990, but experts on electro-hypersensitivity have not taken the connection seriously. Today we have thousands of people suffering from a world-wide Silicon Valley syndrome with various names in different countries but there is little or no research done to help them. The message of the book is that a broader approach, looking into combinations of cause and effect, is necessary. ,.--.,,.--.,.-,-.,,.--.,,.-.-,,.--.,,.-.-,,.- Ja Ruotsiksi I Spelet om 3G
I Spelet om 3G Mona Nilsson och Marica Lindblad I Spelet om 3G presenterar frilansjournalisterna Mona Nilsson och Marica Lindblad delar av den omfattande forskning som visar att strålning från mobiltelefoni kan leda till allvarliga konsekvenser för människors hälsa. De granskar även myndigheternas agerande och finner dolda bindningar och en upprörande flathet mot en mäktig industri. En bild av maktfullkomlighet framträder som yttrar sig i ett ointresse för de drabbade och ett pokerspel med vår hälsa. "Idag pågår utbyggnaden av det trådlösa samhället i rekordfart. Artiklarna i denna bok om spelet om 3g slår hål på en propagandakuliss. Frilansjournalisterna Mona Nilsson och Marica Lindblad klarlägger vad som sker under det som synes ske. De angriper frågorna respektlöst, ställer de obekväma frågorna och nöjer sig inte med att fogligt återge vad experterna säger. De gräver vidare och blottlägger på så sätt tomheten bakom myndigheternas ställningstaganden. Det är skrämmande och upprörande hur allmänheten förs bakom ljuset under sken av upplysning. Läs och upprörs! Mona Nilsson och Marica Lindblad är ett lika föredömligt som sällsynt exempel på hur kritisk fackjournalistik kan bedrivas. Att de dessutom får oss läsare att ibland dra på mungipan åt maktens företrädare gör inte saken sämre." ,.-,.--.,,.--.,-.,-.,,.--.,,.--.,-.,,.--.,,.--.,,.--.,,.--.,.-,-.,-.,
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Mar 26, 2007 13:19:45 GMT 2
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 16, 2007 19:18:08 GMT 2
here is some site that i have not seen before, it has many texts about Teslas inventions: www.frank.germano.com/index.htmand here is one text from merlib.org/mirror/frank.germano/flying_machine2NIKOLA TESLA Man Ahead Of His Time; Tesla's Flying Machine [ Part One ] Nikola Tesla, inventor of alternating current motors, did the basic research for constructing electromagnetic field lift-and-drive aircraft and spacecraft. From 1891 to 1893, he gave a set of lectures and demonstrations to groups of electrical engineers. As part of each show, Tesla stood in the middle of the stage, using his 6' 6" height, with an assistant on either side, each 7 feet away. All 3 men wore thick cork or rubber shoe soles to avoid being electrically grounded. Each assistant held a wire, part of a high voltage, low current circuit. When Tesla raised his arms to each side, violet colored electricity jumped harmlessly across the gaps between the men. At high voltage and frequency in this arrangement, electricity flows over a surface, even the skin, rather than into it. This is a basic circuit which could be used by aircraft and/or spacecraft. It's time to see what Tesla really had envisioned. Let's go to the source - Nikola Tesla, himself, shall we? According to Tesla: "I am now planning aerial machines devoid of sustaining planes, ailerons, propellers, and other external attachments, which will be capable of immense speeds" - "My Inventions" - Tesla's autobiography. To a Westinghouse manager, Tesla wrote, "You should not be at all surprised, if some day you see me fly from New York to Colorado Springs in a contrivance which will resemble a gas stove and weigh as much. ... and could, if necessary, enter and depart through a window." - "Tesla: Man Out of Time," by Margaret Chaney, pg.198. Tesla intended the world to have a free, wireless, source of power "My power generator will be of the simplest kind - just a big mass of steel, copper and aluminum comprising a stationary and rotating part, peculiarly assembled." Further, according to museum officials at The Nikola Tesla museum in Belgrade, "he left sketches of interplanetary ships. This information, however, has not been made available to western scholars." Telsa: Man Out Of Time, pg. 203. This all sound fantastic. We have Tesla, himself, vividly describing a new type of Flying Machine. Presented with those statements, perhaps we can find out just what Tesla envisioned. We have now something confronting us which, has up until now, been misunderstood. Let's take a look at some quotes from Tesla in the "New York Herald Tribune" on October 15th, 1911, entitled "Tesla's Monarch Of Machines" - "And it makes the airplane practical," I suggested. "Not the airplane, the flying machine," responded Dr. Tesla. "Now you have struck the point in which I am most deeply interested--the object toward which I have been devoting my energies for more than twenty years - the dream of my life. It was in seeking the means of making the perfect flying machine that I developed this engine." "Twenty years ago I believed that I would be the first man to fly; that I was on the track of accomplishing what no one else was anywhere near reaching. I was working entirely in electricity then and did not realize that the gasoline engine was approaching a perfection that was going to make the airplane feasible. There is nothing new about the airplane but its engine, you know. What I was working on twenty years ago was the wireless transmission of electric power. My idea was a flying machine propelled by an electric motor, with power supplied from stations on the earth. I have not accomplished this as yet, but am confident that I will in time. When I found that I had been anticipated as to the flying machine, by men working in a different field I began to study the problem from other angles, to regard it as a mechanical rather than an electrical problem. I felt certain there must be some means of obtaining power that was better than any now in use, and by vigorous use of my gray matter for a number of years I grasped the possibilities of the principle of the viscosity and adhesion of fluids and conceived the mechanism of my engine." "Now that I have it, my next step will be the perfect flying machine." "An airplane driven by your engine?" I asked. "Not at all," said Dr. Tesla. "The airplane is fatally defective. It is merely a toy, a sporting plaything. It can never become commercially practical. It has fatal defects. One is the fact that when it encounters a downward current of air it is helpless. The 'hole in the air' of which aviators speak is simply a downward current, and unless the airplane is high enough above the earth to move laterally but can do nothing but fall. There is no way of detecting these downward currents, no way of avoiding them, and therefore the airplane must always be subject to chance and its operator to the risk of fatal accident. Sportsmen will always take these chances, but as a business proposition the risk is too great." "The flying machine of the future - my flying machine - will be heavier than air, but it will not be an airplane. It will have no wings. It will be substantial, solid, stable. You cannot have a stable airplane. The gyroscope can never be successfully applied to the airplane, for it would give a stability that would result in the machine being torn to pieces by the wind, just as the unprotected airplane on the ground is torn to pieces by a high wind. My flying machine will have neither wings nor propellers. You might see it on the ground and you would never guess that it was a flying machine. Yet it will be able to move at will through the air in any direction with perfect safety, higher speeds than have yet been reached, regardless of weather and oblivious of 'holes in the air' or downward currents. It will ascend in such currents if desired. It can remain absolutely stationary in the air even in a wind for great length of time. Its lifting power will not depend upon any such delicate devices as the bird has to employ, but upon positive mechanical action." "You will get stability through gyroscopes?" I asked. "Through gyroscopic action of my engine, assisted by some devices I am not yet prepared to talk about," he replied. "Powerful air currents that may be deflected at will, if produced by engines and compressors sufficiently light and powerful, might lift a heavy body off the ground and propel it through the air," I ventured, wondering if I had grasped the inventor's secret. Dr. Tesla smiled an inscrutable smile. "All I have to say on that point is that my airship will have neither gas bag, wings nor propellers," he said. "It is the child of my dreams, the product of years of intense and painful toil and research. I am not going to talk about it any further. But whatever my airship may be, here at least is an engine that will do things that no other engine ever has done, and that is something tangible." END. Further, from Nikola Tesla's autobiography, "My Inventions" we have this quote - "As stated on a previous occasion, when I was a student at college I conceived a flying machine quite unlike the present ones. The underlying principle was sound, but could not be carried into practice for want of a prime-mover of sufficiently great activity. In recent years, I have successfully solved this problem and am now planning aerial machines devoid of sustaining planes, ailerons, propellers, and other external attachments, which will be capable of immense speeds and are very likely to furnish powerful arguments for peace in the near future. Such a machine, sustained and propelled entirely by reaction, is shown on one of the pages of my lectures, and is supposed to be controlled either mechanically, or by wireless energy. By installing proper plants, it will be practicable to project a missile of this kind into the air and drop it almost on the very spot designated, which may be thousands of miles away..." See artist illustration, right. Tesla's Flying Machine: Firstly, compliments to Bill Smith, through Keely-Net (2001) for the basis of this article, below. The artist illustrations (below and right) best describe the remainder of the article. How could we identify the shape, and then the operation of Tesla's Flying Machine? Let us also make no mistake; although Tesla did patent (#'s - 0165513, and 0165514; Method Of Aerial Transportation) a type of Flying Machine, and both powered by his amazing Tesla Turbine, this craft is certainly not what he is referring to in these writings. Note, in every case, Tesla states that his craft would not have wings, propellers, nor gas bags. With this behind us, let's dive into some thought on what this new type of Flying Machine might be. Here, in Part One, we will delve into the eclectically powered version of the flying machine. In Part Two, we will explore yet another possibility, entirely. Let's begin with the hull for this version. The hull is best made of a twin (double sided) thin, machine-able, slightly flexible ceramic. This becomes a good electrical insulator, has no fire danger, resists any damaging effects of severe heat and cold, and has the hardness of armor. Besides being easy for magnetic fields to pass through, with our modern Ceramics, it is also easy to mass-produce. The inner hull is covered on it's outside by wedge-shaped, thin metal sheets of copper or aluminum, bonded to the ceramic. Each sheet is 3 to 4 feet wide at the horizontal rim of the hull and tapers to a few inches wide at the top of the hull for the top set of metal sheets, or at the bottom for the bottom set of sheets. Each sheet is separated on either side from the next sheet by 1 or 2 inches of uncovered ceramic hull. The top set of sheets and bottom set of sheets are separated by about 6 inches of uncovered ceramic hull around the horizontal rim of the hull. The outer hull protects these sheets from being short-circuited by wind blown metal foil (Air Force radar confusing chaff), heavy rain or concentrations of gasoline or kerosene fumes. If unshielded, fuel fumes could be electro-statically attracted to the hull sheets, burn and form carbon deposits across the insulating gaps between the sheets, causing a short-circuit. The space, the outer hull with a slight negative charge, would absorb hits from micro-meteorites and cosmic rays (protons moving at near the speed of light). Any danger of this type that doesn't already have a negative electric charge would get a negative charge in hitting the outer hull, and be repelled by the metal sheets before it could hit the inner hull. This wouldn't work well on a very big meteor, I might add. The hull can be made in a variety of shapes; sphere, football, disc, or streamlined rectangle or triangle, as long as these metal sheets, "are of considerable area and arranged along ideal enveloping surfaces of very large radii of curvature," (p. 85. "My Inventions" , by Nikola Tesla.) The power plant for this machine can be a standard diesel electric for long range and long-term use, or, as Tesla my have envisioned - his Tesla Turbine, running on either steam, or combustibles, which turns the generators. A short range machine can use a hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell to run a low-voltage motor to turn the generators, occasionally recharging by hovering next to high voltage power lines and using antennas mounted on the outer hull to take in the electricity. The short-range machine can also have electricity beamed to it from a generating plan on a long-range aircraft / spacecraft or on the ground. Reference: St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Nov. 24, 1987, Vol 109, No. 328, "The Forever Plane" by Geoffrey Rowan, (p.D1, D7 and "Popular Science", Vol 232, No. 1, Jan. 1988, "Secret of Perpetual Flight? Beam Power Plane," by Arthur Fisher, (p. 62-65, 106). Another fascinating concept would be through the use of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, to "beam" the power directly to the craft from bases on the ground. From my perspective, this option is quite probably what Tesla had in mind all the time. Lastly, it is also quite possible that Tesla had envisioned his aerial machine to draw its power directly from the Ether, powering the craft directly from the wheel-works of nature itself. See my page, "Tesla's Black Box" for yet another theory regarding the use of a smaller transmitter, that purportedly powered the infamous 1933 Pearce Arrow car. Time will tell. See artist sketch, below, right. One standard for the generators is to have the same number of magnets as field coils. Tesla's preferred design was a thin disc holding 480 magnets with 480 field coils wired in series surrounding it in close tolerance; at 50 revolutions per minute, it produces 19,400 cycles per second. The electricity is fed into a number of large capacitors, one for each metal sheet. An automatic switch, adjustable in timing by the pilot, closes, and as the electricity jumps across the switch, back and forth, it raises it's own frequency; a switch being used for each capacitor. The electricity goes into a Tesla transformer; again, one transformer for each capacitor. In an oil tank to insulate the windings and for cooling, and supported internally by wood, or plastic, pipe and fittings, each Tesla transformer looks like a short wider pipe that is moved along a longer, narrower pipe by an insulated non-electric cable handle. The short pipe, the primary, is 6 to 10 windings (loops) of wire connected in series to the long pipe. The secondary is 460 to 600 windings, at the low voltage and frequency end. The insulated non-electric cable handle is used through a set of automatic controls to move the primary coil to various places on the secondary coil. This is the frequency control. The secondary coil has a low frequency and voltage end and a maximum voltage and frequency end. The greater the frequency the electricity, the more it pushes against the earth's electrostatic and electromagnetic fields. The electricity comes out of the transformer at the high voltage end and goes by wire through the ceramic hull to the wide end of the metal sheet. The electricity jumps out on and flows over the metal sheet, giving off a very strong electromagnetic field, controlled by the transformer. At the narrow end of the metal sheet, most of the high-voltage push having been given off, the electricity goes back by wire through the hull to a circuit breaker box (emergency shut off), then to the other side of the generators. In bright sunlight, the aircraft / spacecraft may seem surrounded by hot air, a slight magnetic distortion of the light. In semi-darkness and night, the metal sheets glow, even through the thin ceramic outer hull, with different colors. The visible light is a by-product of the electricity flowing over the metal sheets, according to the frequencies used. Descending, landing or just starting to lift from the ground, the transformer primaries are near the secondary weak ends and therefore, the bottom set of sheets glow a misty red. Red may also appear at the front of the machine when it is moving forward fast, lessening resistance up front. Orange appears for slow speed. Orange-yellow are for airplane-type speeds. Green and blue are for higher speeds. With a capacitor addition, making it oversized for the circuit, the blue becomes bright white, like a searchlight, with possible risk of damaging the metal sheets involved. The highest visible frequency is violet, like Tesla's stage demonstrations, used for the highest speed along with the bright white. The colors are nearly coherent, of a single frequency, like a laser. A machine built with a set of super conducting magnets would simplify and reduce electricity needs from a vehicle's transformer circuits to the point of flying along efficiently and hovering with little electricity. When Tesla was developing arc lights to run on alternating current, there was a bothersome high-pitched whine, whistle, or buzz, due to the electrodes rapidly heating and cooling. Tesla put this noise in the ultrasonic range with the special transformer already mentioned. The aircraft / spacecraft gives off such noises when working at low frequencies. Timing is important in the operation of this machine. For every 3 metal sheets, when the middle one is briefly turned off, the sheet on either side is energized, giving off the magnetic field. The next instant, the middle sheet is energized, while the sheet on either side is briefly turned off. There is a time delay in the capacitors recharging themselves, so at any time, half of all the metal sheets are energized and the other half are recharging, alternating all around the inner hull. This balances the machine, giving it very good stability. This balance is less when fewer of the circuits are in use. Fairly close, the aircraft / spacecraft produces heating of persons and objects on the ground; but by hovering over an area at low altitude for maybe 5 or 10 minutes, the machine also produces a column of very cold air down to the ground. As air molecules get into the strong magnetic fields that the machine is transmitting out, the air molecules become polarized and from lines, or strings, of air molecules. The normal movement of the air is stopped, and there is suddenly a lot more room for air molecules in this area, so more air pours in. This expansion and the lack of normal air motion make the area intensely cold. This is also the reason that the aircraft / spacecraft can fly at supersonic speeds without making sonic booms. As air flows over the hull, top and bottom, the air molecules form lines as they go through the magnetic fields of the metal sheet circuits. As the air molecules are left behind, they keep their line arrangements for a short time, long enough to cancel out the sonic boom shock waves. Outside the earth's magnetic field, another propulsion system must be used, which relies on the first. You may have read of particle accelerators, or cyclotrons, or atom-smashers. A particle accelerator is a circular loop of pipe that, in cross-section, is oval. In a physics laboratory, most of the air in it is pumped out. The pipe loop is given a static electric charge, a small amount of hydrogen or other gas is given the same electric charge so the particles won't stick to the pipe. A set of electromagnets all around the pipe loop turn on and off, one after the other, pushing with one magnetic pole and pulling with the next, until those gas particles are racing around the pipe loop at nearly the speed of light. Centrifugal force makes the particles speed closer to the outside edge of the pipe loop, still within the pipe. The particles break down into electrons, or light and other wavelengths, protons or cosmic rays, and neutrons if more than hydrogen is put in the accelerator. At least 2 particle accelerators are used to balance each other and counter each other's tendency to make the craft spin. Otherwise, the machine would tend to want to start spinning, following the direction of the force being applied to the particles. The accelerators push in opposite directions. As the pilot and crew travel in space, outside the magnetic field of a world, water from a tank is electrically separated into oxygen and hydrogen. Waste carbon dioxide that isn't used for the onboard garden, and hydrogen (helium if the machine is using a fusion reactor) is slowly, constantly fed into the inside curves of both accelerators. The high speed particles go out through straight lengths of pipe, charged like the loops and in speeding out into space, push the machine along. Doors control which pips the particles leave from. This allows very long range acceleration and later deceleration at normal (earth) gravity. This avoids the severe problems of weightlessness, including lowered physical abilities of the crew. It is possible to use straight-line particle accelerators, even as few as one per machine, but these don't seem as able to get the best machine speed for the least amount of particles pushed out. Using a constant acceleration of 32.2 feet per second per second provides earth normal gravity in deep space and only 2 gravities of stress in leaving the earth's gravity field. It takes, not counting air resistance, 18 minutes, 58.9521636 seconds to reach the 25,000 miles per hour speed to leave the earth's gravity field. It takes about 354 days, 12 hours, 53 minutes and 40 seconds (about) to reach the speed of light - 672,487,072.7 miles per hour. It takes the same distance to decelerate as it does to speed up, but this cuts down the time delay that one would have in conventional chemical rocketry enormously, for a long journey. A set of superconducting magnets can be charged by metal sheet circuits, within limits, to whatever frequency is needed and will continue to transmit that magnetic field frequency almost indefinitely. A shortwave radio can be used to find the exact frequencies that an aircraft / spacecraft is using, for each of the colors it may show whole a color television can show the same overall color frequency that the nearby, but not extremely close, craft is using This is limited, as a machine traveling at the speed of a jet airliner may broadcast in a frequency range usually used for radar sets. The craft circuits override lower frequency, lower voltage electric circuits within and near their electromagnetic fields. One source briefly mentioned a 1941 incident, where a shortwave radio was used to override automobile ignition systems, up to 3 miles away. When the shortwave radio was turned off, the cars could work again. One construction arrangement for this craft to avoid such interference is for the metal sheet circuits to be more sharply tuned. Quartz or other crystals can be used in capacitors; in a very large number of low-powered, single frequency circuits, or as part of a frequency control for the metal sheet circuits. The aircraft / spacecraft easily overrides lower frequency and lower voltage electric circuits up to a 6 mile wide circle around it, but the effect is usually not tuned for such a drastic show. It can be used for fire fighting: by hovering at a medium-low height at low frequency, it forms a double negative pole magnet of itself and the ground, the sides being a rotation of positive magnetic pole. It polarizes the column of air in this field. The air becomes icy cold. If it wouldn't put the fire out, it would slow it down. Tesla went broke in the early 1900's building a combination radio and electric power broadcasting station. The theory and experiments were correct but the financiers didn't want peace and prosperity for all. The Japanese physicist who developed superconducting material with strong magnetism allows for a simplified construction of the aircraft / spacecraft. Blocks of this material can be used in place of the inner hull metal sheets. By putting electricity in each block, the pilot can control the strength of the magnetic field it gives off and can reduce the field strength by draining some of the electric charge. This allows the same amount of work to be done with vastly less electricity used to do it. It is surprising that Jonathan Swift, in his "Gulliver's Travels", 1726, third book, "A Voyage to Laputa", described an imagined magnetic flying island that comes close to being what a large superconducting aircraft / spacecraft can be build as, using little or no electric power to hover and mover around. Compliments: Bill Smith, Keely-Net, 2001. Used by permission. If you enjoyed this read...take some time to look over the book, "Wonder Of The Worlds" By author Sesh Heri. Author Sesh Heri has done a brilliant job taking historical and highly accurate scientific facts from Tesla's life, and interweaving them into a story that will keep you reading till the very end. It has great characters, such as Nikola Tesla, Mark Twain, Harry Houdini, and of coarse, those darn Martian villains. Tesla's Flying Machine literally jumps out of the pages at you! Heri maintains Tesla's characteristic wit, and the entire book is extremely sound from a scientific basis. You may be interested in looking at something brilliant from turn of the century multi-millionaire, John Jacob Astor - "A Journey In Other Worlds" - Absolutely fantastic and two years in the writing. Buy the way, you may remember that the unfortunate Astor was on the maiden voyage of the Titanic and went down with the ship. Had he lived, and used his unlimited wealth to pursue the ideas presented in this book, we may have had Tesla's Flying Machine, and a few others, already! Buy the books from Amazon.com, below. To continue with our exploration of Tesla's Flying Machine with a different version...see part two, below. Tesla's Flying Machine - [ Part One ][ Part Two ] "If ever we can ascertain at what period the earth's charge, when disturbed, oscillates - we shall know a fact, possibly of the greatest importance to the welfare of the human race." ; Nikola Tesla, 1893
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 12, 2007 10:57:55 GMT 2
The problem with the "over-unity" concept goes back to the "First Law of Thermodynamics" and its inherent idea about the ability to convert one form of energy into another. This assumption includes the idea that these various conversions are accomplished at known and accepted rates of exchange. The idea of efficiency of conversion requires that the various rates of exchange are fixed and act as an upper limit for the calculation of a ratio that approaches one (100%) where the numerator of this fraction is the "output" and the denominator is the "input." Since it is generally agreed that every machine experiences so-called losses, the idea that this ratio could be greater than one is, of course, ridiculous. This, coupled with the assumption in the "Second Law" that all energy systems are closed, (meaning that no new energy can enter the system in-between the "input" and the "output") makes the idea of an "over-unity" system even more impossible than a mere perpetual motion machine. The line of logic embodied in the "Laws of Thermodynamics" is flawless. The problem doesn't exist in the logic, but it does illustrate that logic alone is not enough to reveal the truth. The problem exists in certain interpretations of these "Laws." Let's go back and look at the "First Law" again in light of our "over-unity" discussion. "Energy can be changed from one form to another, but it is neither created nor destroyed." This seems simple enough to understand. Underneath the surface, however, there is an assumption that this also means that energy will not spontaneously appear or disappear from the system. This is also a necessary condition if conservation of energy is to be satisfied LOCALLY as well as UNIVERSALLY. This discussion becomes relevant, for instance, in describing the operation of the rotating magnet generator, the so called N-machine or Space Power Generator (SPG). Most of the important work in this field has been done by Bruce DePalma and Parmahamsa Tewari. The following is a brief summary. The rotation of the magnet sets up two force fields that act at right angles to each other. These two force fields are the radially distributed inertial frame of space (centrifugal force) and the intersecting axially distributed magnetic field of the rotating magnet. The area of magnetized, polarized, inertial space appears to open up a region through which new energy can enter the system. When careful measurements are taken of current flows in the generator and in the external circuit, evidence suggests that electric charges are appearing at the periphery of the generator and disappearing at the center of the generator that do not actually pass through the generator. This experimental finding may explain why this configuration of electric generator experiences less mechanical drag than standard generator designs for each unit of electrical output produced. While energy is probably not being created or destroyed in the universal context, it is apparently appearing and disappearing from the machine during operation in the local space. This extra energy can be used to produce useful work in external circuits. Tewari has shown that twice as much hydrogen can be generated from an electrolysis cell run from the output of a SPG than if the cell is run directly. It is impossible to rationalize the behavior of this style of electric generator with the ideas of simple conversion and local conservation as they are postulated in the "First Law of Thermodynamics." In a standard generator, if all losses are ignored for the moment, conventional theory says if 550 Ft-Lbs of work are applied to the input shaft in one second, 746 Watts will be delivered at the output. If I blindly believe that the generator simply has the mysterious ability to convert the mechanical energy into electrical energy, I don't ask the following questions: what is the mechanism of this conversion?, where does the torque go?, and where does the electrical energy come from? The apparent observation that the generated current produces a motoring effect that opposes the input torque should not be interpreted as a vindication of the conservation rule, but as an admission that this is an inefficient way to generate electricity. The Space Power Generator experiences far less drag per unit of electrical output than a standard generator. This opens up a much larger discussion about the validity of the conversion idea all together. Are there actual and universal equivalents between the various forms of heat, mechanical work, and electricity? At this point, all we know for sure are the various measurements that have been taken from the devices that demonstrate these energy translations. For instance, in 1845, James Joule found that if he placed a small paddle wheel in a bucket of water, he had to apply 772.5 foot-pounds of mechanical work to spin the paddle wheel to raise the temperature of one pound of water, one degree Fahrenheit. This has led to very careful calculations that now set this "universal conversion" between mechanical work and heat at 778.26 FT-Lbs = 1 BTU. For paddle wheels in water, this is no doubt true. But what happens if paddle wheels are not used? Is there another method that does not use paddle wheels in water to convert mechanical work to heat that does the job better, with less expenditure of work for the same heat gained? The answer is yes. In fact, there are numerous patents on record to accomplish this. One uses rotating parallel disks, not unlike the design of Tesla's turbine, to heat water with less than half the mechanical expenditure. Once again, we have entered a new scientific era where the exact equivalence between mechanical work as foot-pounds, electrical work as watt-hours, and heat work as BTU's is not known! A wide variety of physical experiments have demonstrated a broad range of differing energy translation effects. The intellectual edifice of Clausius' conversion idea is crumbling, and no one should allow their thinking to be constrained by it any longer. The results of physical experiments have all but disproved it. The "First Law of Thermodynamics" should be seen only as an outmoded, intellectual MODEL that is not supported by all of the experimental data. Likewise, the idea of "over-unity" should be abandoned by those working on "free energy" systems as it is an intellectual contradiction based both on the belief in conversion and the ability to circumvent it. "Over-unity" is an oxymoron that should be removed from the vocabulary of the alternative science community. This brings me back to the other problem presented earlier, namely, the nature of heat itself. Is heat, as Hermann von Helmholtz suggests, simply the random motion of molecular matter, or is it something completely different, whose presence causes molecular matter to exhibit random motion? This is a very long and involved exploration that has already been handled masterfully by Rudolf Steiner in March of 1920 and published as his Warmth Course. I will summarize some of these ideas briefly. The ancient's believed that there were four "elements" that all physical reality was composed of. These were Earth, Water, Air and Fire. In modern language, we can restate this as follows. There are four "states" that all matter appears as. These are solid, liquid, gas and heat. From an etheric science point of view, heat is the fourth state of matter and the transition state between matter and ether. Here is why. The only difference between the appearance of ice, water, or steam, for example, is its temperature or internal heat condition. Heat is absolutely fundamental in all considerations regarding matter because a change in heat is the only element required to bring about a change of state from solid to liquid or from liquid to gas. In solid matter, the "atoms" are very close together and they bind each other in a way that allows them to hold their shape without being in a container. Heat can be added to the solid and its temperature will rise, correspondingly, until the melting point is reached. At this point, adding more heat does not raise its temperature, but rather causes the material to change state as the solid melts into a liquid. Once all of the material is liquified, adding more heat once again causes the temperature to rise. In liquid matter, the "atoms" are less close together and they bind each other in a way that allows the liquid to take the shape of whatever open topped container it is put in. As more heat is added to the liquid, the "atoms" move farther apart until the boiling point is reached. At this point, once again, adding more heat does not raise its temperature, but rather causes the material to change state as the liquid boils into a gas. Once all of the material is gaseous, adding more heat once again causes the temperature to rise. In gaseous matter, the "atoms" are so far apart that they will hold no shape at all and can only be contained by a complete enclosure. As more heat is added to the gas, the "atoms" become so dispersed that eventually, all that is left is the heat. The relationships between heat, temperature, matter and state are quite complex and cannot easily be reduced to simple explanations. Steiner's explorations of these relationships go into great detail, forming a seamless line of logic, backed up by a great deal of experimental data. Anyone interested in the nature of heat should study Rudolf Steiner's Warmth Course. While this may make no sense to people trained in mechanistic thought processes, it is much closer to the truth about heat than the ideas of Helmholtz, with which Steiner was completely familiar. Helmholtz's idea that the nature of heat can be fully described by the random motions of molecular matter is far too simplistic. It ignores many of the well known behaviors of heat and matter as well as the existence of the Etheric Energy Field. It should be considered an "interesting" historical attempt to describe heat that is not supported by all of the experimental data. For those who are not familiar with etheric science, it might be useful to review some of the characteristics of the Etheric Energy Field at this time. The Etheric Energy Field is made up of an extremely fine, mass-free fluid. Its activity can be divided into four main levels. These different aspects of the Ether have been called: the Warmth Ether, the Light Ether, the Tone (or Chemical) Ether, and the Life Ether. The Etheric Energy Field, as a whole, penetrates all matter, flows around and through the planet in well defined ways, exhibits elastic characteristics, and spontaneously moves from low concentrations to high concentrations before discharging. Understanding all of these factors has made engineering the weather a practical reality today. Many other amazing technologies also become possible when the ether is fully understood. Likewise, many aspects of today's science that are still confusing eventually become clear. One area of the greatest confusion lies in the field of electrical science. The entire study of what has been called "static electricity" is just a confusing encounter with the Light Ether as it behaves under certain circumstances. When fully understood, so-called "static electricity" will be seen to be neither static nor electricity. Normal electricity always flows from high potential to low potential and usually requires metallic conductors to flow along. On the other hand, "static electricity" does not discharge in the same way, and readily moves and collects on both conductors and insulators. Because "static electricity" behaves more like ether than electricity, I am going coin a term for this form of energy when it is present in wires and circuits. I call it "ETHERICITY", to distinguish it from electricity all together. In some ways, ethericity behaves like electricity and in some ways it behaves differently. This has been the source of confusion. Up until now, most people have thought that there was only one kind of energy moving in electrical style circuits. This can now change. Electric appliances are designed to run on the discharge of electric potential from high to low, as in the draining of a battery to power a load. Properly designed circuits employing ethericity run the appliance on the charging phase, as the energy spontaneously moves from low potential to high. Once the behaviors of ethericity are clearly understood, it will be just as easy to run motors and lights from this source as we now do on electricity. In the 1940's, Dr. Wilhelm Reich demonstrated both lighting and motoring effects running on the Etheric Energy Field that he tapped using his "orgone accumulators" and special circuitry. But many other ways have been discovered to harness ethericity. The patent office has many designs of so-called "electrostatic" motors on file that work quite well. They all run on ethericity, including some powered by circuits set up between the ground and a wire suspended high in the air. Many types of capacitors will spontaneously charge up on days with low relative humidity. This, too, is the classic appearance of ethericity. I have seen how an "electrostatic" generator failed to do anything, one humid morning, until the moment that sunlight fell on the metallic surfaces. It then jumped to life. This was one of the most convincing demonstrations I have ever seen that "static electricity" (ethericity) is related to light (the Light Ether). Here then are some of the known characteristics of ethericity that engineers and inventors should understand: 1) Ethericity can be accumulated from the ground or the air at almost any location 2) It can be "reflected" down wires (this is not conduction) 3) Flows of ethericity can be interrupted by diodes and Mosfet type devices 4) Its potential can be raised or lowered in air core transformers 5) It can be stored in capacitors 6) It will operate neon style lighting, when the potential is high enough 7) It can create fields of opposing forces in coils and motor windings. "Free energy" is here in the Etheric Energy Field Etheric Energy can be accumulated without the expenditure of work, and then released in controlled ways to perform work, in properly engineered systems. Understanding this fact presents engineers and inventors the clearest and most direct path to follow. Systems that precipitate heat directly from the ether have already been demonstrated in Dr. Reich's accumulator. Placing one of these accumulators over a moving body of water increases the precipitation of heat dramatically. This is a rich vane of truth waiting to reveal its secrets to the systematic researcher. Likewise, power circuits that run on ethericity for lighting and motive power are waiting to be perfected. Researchers in the "free energy" field should not concern themselves with the ideas presented as the so-called "Laws of Thermodynamics". The "First Law", with its ideas of conversion and conservation, is essentially incorrect. There is no way to convert mechanical energy into etheric energy, actually make one into the other. This one example is enough to disprove the universal interpretation of the conversion idea all together. Beyond this, the energy forms that can be transmuted by the action of certain kinds of machines, apparently do so within a wide range of activity, depending on the geometry of the machine. This throws into question the idea of conservation, especially local conservation. These experimental findings render the "First Law" without any basis in fact. The real universe does not behave in accordance with these ideas. In the narrow case, the "Second Law" is really only a statement which describes the behavior of heat under certain circumstances. This much is basically true, as it is founded on experimental observation. In the general case, however, the "Second Law" is an intellectual extrapolation that does not accurately describe the behavior of physical reality under all circumstances. It embodies an erroneously concept of a mechanical universe which mysteriously burst forth (Big Bang) as a fully wound spring that has been unwinding ever since ("in a closed system, entropy does not decrease"). It is a lifeless, empty vision that ignores the Source of the energy it started with and closes the minds of its adherents to the solutions at hand. Learning how to tap the non-thermodynamic forces in nature is the hope of the future. A modern society needs light, heat, and motive power, all of which can be derived directly from the Etheric Energy Field without consuming limited physical resources owned by monopoly interests. In this society, theoretical science has been elevated to a very high level of prestige. Under this system of belief, the real needs of humanity have not been well served. It is time that these incorrect theories be carefully examined and discarded, so that experimental science can once again take the leading role in defining the nature of physical reality. Only then will Etheric Science be free to offer its bounty of solutions to a desperate and waiting world. Bibliography 1) The Cancer Biopathy by Dr. Wilhelm Reich (Vol. II of The Discovery of the Orgone), Farar, Straus and Girous, 1973 2) Man or Matter by Ernst Lehrs, Rudolf Steiner Press, London, 1958 3) The Cosmic Pulse of Life by Trevor James Constable, Borderlands Science Research Foundation, Garberville, California, 1991 4) Warmth Course by Rudolf Steiner, Mercury Press, Spring Valley, New York 5) Etheric Formative Forces in Cosmos, Earth and Man by Guenter Wachsmuth, 1932, reprinted 1993 by Borderlands Science Research Foundation, Garberville, California 6) The Vril Compendium by Gerry Vassilatos, Vols I-VII released 1993, Borderlands Science Research Foundation, Garberville, California 7) Loom of the Future - The Weather Engineering Work of Trevor James Constable (an interview book/photo album), Borderlands Science Research Foundation, Garberville, California, 1994 If this information interests you, there is a great deal more information located on our website www.free-energy.ws
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 12, 2007 10:57:33 GMT 2
So, the Third Force postponing the public availability of free energy technology is delusion and dishonesty within the movement itself. The motivations are self-aggrandizement, greed, want of power over others, and a false sense of self-importance. The weapons used are lying, cheating, the “bait and switch” con, self-delusion and arrogance combined with lousy science. The Fourth Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is all of the rest of us. It may be easy to see how narrow and despicable the motivations of the other Forces are, but actually, these motivations are still very much alive in each of us as well. Like the Wealthiest Families, don’t we each secretly harbor illusions of false superiority, and the want to control others instead of ourselves? Also, wouldn’t you “sell out” if the price were high enough, say, take $1 million dollars, cash, today? Or like the Governments, don’t we each want to ensure our own survival? If caught in the middle of a full, burning theater, do you panic and push all of the weaker people out of the way in a mad, scramble for the door? Or like the deluded inventor, don’t we trade a comfortable illusion once in a while for an uncomfortable fact? And don’t we like to think more of ourselves than others give us credit for? Or don’t we still fear the unknown, even if it promises a great reward? You see, really, all Four Forces are just different aspects of the same process, operating at different levels in the society.
There is really only ONE FORCE preventing the public availability of free energy technology, and that is the unspiritually motivated behavior of the human animals. In the last analysis, free energy technology is an outward manifestation of Divine Abundance. It is the engine of the economy of an enlightened society, where people voluntarily behave in a respectful and civil manner toward each other. Where each member of the society has everything they need, and do not covet what their neighbor has. Where war and physical violence has become socially unacceptable behavior and people’s differences are at least tolerated, if not enjoyed.
The appearance of free energy technology in the public domain is the dawning of a truly civilized age. It is an epochal event in human history. Nobody can “take credit” for it. Nobody can “get rich” on it. Nobody can “rule the world” with it. It is simply, a Gift from God. It forces us all to take responsibility for our own actions and for our own self-disciplined self-restraint when needed. The world as it is currently ordered, cannot have free energy technology without being totally transformed by it into something else. This “civilization” has reached the pinnacle of its development, because it has birthed the seeds of its own transformation. The unspiritualized human animals cannot be trusted with free energy. They will only do what they have always done, which is take merciless advantage of each other, or kill each other and themselves in the process. If you go back and read Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged or the Club of Rome Report, it becomes obvious that the Wealthiest Families have understood this for decades. Their plan is to live in The World of Free Energy, but permanently freeze the rest of us out. But this is not new. Royalty has always considered the general population (us) to be their subjects. What is new, is that you and I can communicate with each other now better than at anytime in the past. The Internet offers us, the Fourth Force, an opportunity to overcome the combined efforts of the other Forces preventing free energy technology from spreading.
The Opportunity
What is starting to happen is that inventors are publishing their work, instead of patenting it and keeping it secret. More and more, people are “giving away” information on these technologies in books, videos and websites. While there is still a great deal of useless information about free energy on the Internet, the availability of good information is rising rapidly. Check out the list of websites and other resources at the end of this article. It is imperative that you begin to gather all of the information you can on real free energy systems. The reason for this is simple. The first two Forces will never allow an inventor or a company to build and sell a free energy machine to you! The only way you will ever get one is if you, or a friend, build it yourself. This is exactly what thousands of people are already quietly starting to do. You may feel wholly inadequate to the task, but start gathering information now. You may be just a link in the chain of events for the benefit of others. Focus on what you can do now, not on how much there still is to be done. Small, private research groups are working out the details as you read this. Many are committed to publishing their results on the Internet. All of us constitute the Fourth Force.
If we stand up and refuse to remain ignorant and action-less, we can change the course of history. It is the aggregate of our combined action that can make a difference. Only the mass action that represents our consensus can create the world we want. The other three Forces WILL NOT help us put a fuelless power plant in our basements. They will not help us be free from their manipulations. Nevertheless, free energy technology is here. It is real, and it will change everything about the way we live, work and relate to each other. In the last analysis, free energy technology obsoletes greed and the fear for survival. But like all exercises of Spiritual Faith, we must first manifest the generosity and trust in our own lives. The Source of Free Energy is INSIDE of us. It is that excitement of expressing ourselves freely. It is our Spiritually guided intuition expressing itself without distraction, intimidation or manipulation. It is our open-heartedness.
Ideally, the free energy technologies underpin a just society where everyone has enough food, clothing, shelter, self-worth, and the leisure time to contemplate the higher Spiritual meanings of Life. Do we not owe it to each other, to face down our fears, and take action to create this future for our children’s children? Perhaps I am not the only one waiting for me to act on a greater Truth. Free energy technology is here. It has been here for decades. Communications technology and the Internet have torn the veil of secrecy off of this remarkable fact. People all over the world are starting to build free energy devices for their own use. The Bankers and the Governments do not want this to happen, but cannot stop it. Tremendous economic instabilities and wars will be used in the near future to distract people from joining the free energy movement. There will be essentially no major media coverage of this aspect of what is going on. It will simply be reported as wars and civil wars erupting everywhere, leading to UN “Peace Keeper” occupation in more and more countries. Western Society is spiraling down toward self-destruction, due to the accumulated effects of long-term greed and corruption. The general availability of free energy technology cannot stop this trend. It can only reinforce it. If, however, you have a free energy device, you may be better positioned to survive the political/social/ economic transition that is underway. No National Government will survive this process. The question is, who will ultimately control the emerging World Government, the First Force, or the Fourth Force? The last Great War is almost upon us. The seeds are planted. After this will come the beginning of a real Civilization. Some of us who refuse to fight will survive to see the dawn of the World of Free Energy. I challenge you to be among the ones who try.
Free Report #2 THERMODYNAMICS AND FREE ENERGY By Peter A. Lindemann
The mainstream scientific community dismisses the idea of "Free Energy" or "Over-Unity" machines because they say that the behavior of such machines violates the "Second Law of Thermodynamics."
The purpose of this article is to squarely face this issue from an alternative science point of view. Many engineers and inventors, working in the alternative energy field, still mistakenly believe that the "Laws of Thermodynamics" are universally true. For them, the "free energy" machine can only be a clever scientific slight of hand where the machine becomes "outlaw", breaking some fundamental universe law. For progress to be made in this field, the limitations and errors inherent in the "Laws of Thermodynamics" must be exposed. Only then will people realize that scientific experimentation is the only reliable tool for revealing the behavior of physical reality. In order to bring this about, it will be helpful to quickly review some of the pivotal historical events which helped shape the modern scientific era with regards to thermodynamics.
Before the year 1800, perpetual motion machines were considered possible and heat was not regarded as a form of energy. Both of these long standing assumptions, dating back thousands of years, were effectively toppled by the ideas of Hermann von Helmholtz in 1847 when he postulated that since no one had ever been able to build a working perpetual motion machine, that just probably, it was not possible. In order to deny the possibility of perpetual motion and hold the argument together, he had to assume that energy in the system was being conserved. It had long been observed that mechanical devices could not transfer energy perfectly. There was always some friction in the working parts. Friction was not only known to impede the transfer of energy in the machine, but it was known to produce heat.
In order to simultaneously explain the work loss and the heat gain, so that conservation could be satisfied, Helmholtz postulated that heat was a form of energy consisting of a small, random motion in the molecules of matter. He went on to speculate that the loss of work in the machine as large scale motion was still present as heat in the small scale motion of the molecules in the material the machine was made of. He suggested from this that both the heat and work must be considered energy, and that it was the total that was conserved, rather than the heat or work separately. By 1850, Rudolf Clausius was able to synthesize the work of Helmholtz, James Joule, Sadi Carnot and others to express a generalized statement that has become known as the "First Law of Thermodynamics." It states that "energy can be changed from one form to another, but it is neither created nor destroyed." By the time this thought became universally believed, it had totally transformed the intellectual landscape of mechanics, physics and energy dynamics. This was a clean break from the set of thoughts and assumptions that had come forward from antiquity. A new era in science had begun.
In understanding these historical developments, it is important to realize that besides the new theoretical explanation about the nature of heat, all of the other data that led to the new theoretical generalizations was derived experimentally. This can be illustrated by an observation made by Sadi Carnot in his extensive work regarding the behavior of heat in machines. He states that "in all cases in which work is produced by the agency of heat, a quantity of heat is consumed that is proportional to the work done; and conversely, by the expenditure of an equal quantity of work, an equal quantity of heat is produced." This statement by Carnot was based on hundreds of experimental measurements. After such convincing experimentation, it was not unreasonable for Clausius to conclude that heat could be converted into mechanical work. It was, however, a theoretical leap of logic to conclude that energy, in general, could be changed from one form to another.
Before we go on, it is important, for our purposes, to be reminded that this new idea expressed as the "First Law of Thermodynamics" consists of a number of overlapping ideas and assumptions that can be expressed as follows: 1) Perpetual motion machines are impossible 2) The nature of heat is reduced to the random motions of molecular matter 3) Energy can be changed from one form to another without any explanation as to how this conversion is actually accomplished in any specific case 4) Energy is not created in or destroyed by its passage through a mechanism 5) All forms of energy behave the same way All of these ideas are fundamentally inherent in "The First Law of Thermodynamics."
From an alternative science point of view, the experimental work of Carnot and Joule will stand for all time. It is the intellectual overlay of Helmholtz and Clausius, on this experimental work, where the problems are introduced. The theory of conversion and the ideas about the nature of heat will be taken up again later in this article, after more ground work has been laid.
The "Second Law of Thermodynamics" evolved out of further studies of the behavior of heat in closed systems. Remarkably, there is no one statement that is universally recognized as the definitive expression of this so called "Law". Among the more popular statements which reflect the general understanding of the "Second Law of Thermodynamics" are the following:
"In a closed system, entropy does not decrease", "The state of order in a closed system does not spontaneously increase without the application of work", "Among all the allowed states of a system with given values of energy, number of particles and constraints, one and only one is a stable equilibrium state", and "It is impossible to construct a device that operates in a cycle and produces no other effect than the production of work and exchange of heat with a single reservoir."
For those who can fathom the language, these statements clearly do not all express the same idea. Some have broad ramifications while others are more narrowly defined. All of these statements grew out of the idea, expressed fairly well as the last statement in the series:
- that a perpetual motion machine could not be made that operated on the principle of a work/heat exchange when this process was limited to a known quantity of heat at the start. After that amount of heat was converted to work and the temperature of the reservoir was reduced to the ambient temperature outside, no further work could be expected to be produced.
This is not only reasonable, but it is backed up by thousands of experiments. As long as the "Law" is clearly and narrowly defined as a statement that reflects upon the behavior of heat in closed systems, this author has no problem with agreeing completely.
Problems arise, however, with some of the more generalized interpretations of the "Law" such as "the state of order in a closed system does not spontaneously increase without the application of work." In order to understand why this statement is not universally true, it is important to clearly define our terms. We must understand what is meant by the "state of order" in a system, and we must define the boundaries of the "closure" of that system.
In the first case, the "state of order" in the system is generally regarded as the temperature. Understanding this, we can rephrase this statement to say, that in a thermally isolated enclosure, the temperature will not increase unless work or energy is added to the system. Here again, by clearly defining our terms, and limiting the discussion to heat and work, we have a universally true statement backed up by mountains of experimental data. If, however, we define the "state of order" as a generalized "quantity of energy", and we further define the "closed system" as the Universe, we are led to believe that under no circumstance is it possible to create a condition where the concentration of energy will increase spontaneously. This is not true! While it should be understood that most known chemical processes, standard electrical equipment and heat generally do behave this way, the Etheric Energy Field of the planet does not. The Etheric Energy Field behaves in direct opposition to the more generalized understandings of the "Second Law of Thermodynamics" and this fact is backed up by considerable experimental data.
One of the best documented examples of this is the spontaneous temperature rise observed in the "orgone accumulator", invented by Dr. Wilhelm Reich in 1940. Here, a simple enclosure made of alternating layers of organic and inorganic material, allows the ambient density of the Etheric Energy Field to become more concentrated in the local area, without the application of work. This new and higher energy concentration is then reflected as a spontaneous rise in temperature. This situation does not break the "Second Law" in the narrow case, because we admit that new energy is entering the system. It does break the "Second Law" in the general case because this energy is entering without the application of external work. Reich's accumulator was designed as an attempt to shield and isolate this energy from its presence in the environment. His data clearly showed, however, that he was not able to isolate the energy effects inside the accumulator because the Etheric Energy Field easily penetrated the walls of the enclosure. He eventually realized that with regard to Etheric Energy Fields, it was impossible to "close the system" in the local sense. This is important to understand because it directly refutes the assumption that the universe consists only of closed systems at all levels of activity. Here then is a major problem with how the scientific community regards the "Laws of Thermodynamics." When the discussion is limited to the behavior of heat in closed systems, the "Second Law of Thermodynamics" is a well tested and accurate description of what happens under those circumstances. It is when it is incorrectly assumed that all forms of energy behave this way and that enclosure of the system is possible at all levels, that grossly false conclusions can be drawn from what started out as experimentally derived observations. The scientific community-at-large obviates these problems simply by denying the existence of the Etheric Energy Field because it doesn't fit within their intellectual model. Unfortunately for them, the mounting experimental evidence is making this increasingly hard to do. Certainly, the best evidence to date of the existence of the Etheric Energy Field and its capability of being drawn to high concentrations without the application of work is demonstrated by the Etheric Weather Engineering, techniques developed by Trevor James Constable and his Atmos Engineering group. As a member of this group, I have personally seen how simple Etheric Energy projectors, that do no work in the classical sense, can cause the etheric potentials in the atmosphere to rise to such high concentrations that millions of gallons of water will precipitate from the air for hours at a time. When these Etheric Energy projectors are motorized, they draw a few hundred watts of electric energy. If the rain produced is dropped behind a dam and then released through a hydro-electric turbine, the electrical energy gain in the system can be enormous, on the order of 100,000 to 1. This method of creating "free energy" is a practical reality today. While I know of no community using this method for supplying its energy needs, it is eminently practicable. This example is theoretical in the sense that it has never been done, but it is a good model of other "free energy" systems under development around the world today. Because the input to motorize the Etheric Energy projectors is electric and the output from the hydro-electric generators is electric, many people might mistake this for a so-called "over-unity" system. There is nothing "over-unity" about this situation. Each and every component of the machinery used in this system has operational and frictional losses. The energy tapped by the system is the atmospheric ether and all of the energy gain in the system occurs outside of the equipment. The fact that a small electric input yields a huge electric output does not mean the system is operating "over-unity."
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 12, 2007 10:57:07 GMT 2
www.nutech2000.com/webtext/energy/linreport.html THE WORLD OF FREE ENERGY
By Peter Lindemann, D.Sc. In the late 1880’s, trade journals in the electrical sciences were predicting “free electricity” in the near future. Incredible discoveries about the nature of electricity were becoming common place. Nikola Tesla was demonstrating “wireless lighting” and other wonders associated with high frequency currents. There was an excitement about the future like never before. Within 20 years, there would be automobiles, airplanes, movies, recorded music, telephones, radio, and practical cameras. The Victorian Age was giving way to something totally new. For the first time in history, common people were encouraged to envision a utopian future, filled with abundant modern transportation and communication, as well as jobs, housing and food for everyone. Disease would be conquered, and so would poverty. Life was getting better, and this time, everyone was going to get “a piece of the pie.” So, what happened? In the midst of this technological explosion, where did the energy breakthroughs go? Was all of this excitement about “free electricity”, which happened just before the beginning of the last century, all just wishful thinking that “real science” eventually disproved? Current State of Technology Actually, the answer to that question is NO. In fact, the opposite is true. Spectacular energy technologies were developed right along with the other breakthroughs. Since that time, multiple methods for producing vast amounts of energy at extremely low cost have been developed. None of these technologies have made it to the “open” consumer market as an article of commerce, however. Exactly why this is true will be discussed shortly. But first, I would like to describe to you a short list of “free energy” technologies that I am currently aware of, and that are proven beyond all reasonable doubt. The common feature connecting all of these discoveries, is that they use a small amount of one form of energy to control or release a large amount of a different kind of energy. Many of them tap the underlying Æther field in some way; a source of energy conveniently ignored by “modern” science. 1) Radiant Energy. Nikola Tesla’s Magnifying Transmitter, T. Henry Moray’s Radiant Energy Device, Edwin Gray’s EMA Motor, and Paul Baumann’s Testatika Machine all run on Radiant Energy. This natural energy form can be gathered directly from the environment (mistakenly called “static” electricity) or extracted from ordinary electricity by the method called “fractionation.” Radiant Energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity, at less than 1% of the cost. It does not behave exactly like electricity, however, which has contributed to the scientific community’s misunderstanding of it. The Methernitha Community in Switzerland currently has 5 or 6 working models of fuelless, self-running devices that tap this energy. 2) Permanent Magnets. Dr. Robert Adams (NZ) has developed astounding designs of electric motors, generators and heaters that run on permanent magnets. One such device draws 100 watts of electricity from the source, generates 100 watts to recharge the source, and produces over 140 BTU’s of heat in two minutes! Dr. Tom Bearden (USA) has two working models of a permanent magnet powered electrical transformer. It uses a 6-watt electrical input to control the path of a magnetic field coming out of a permanent magnet. By channeling the magnetic field, first to one output coil and then a second output coil, and by doing this repeatedly and rapidly in a “Ping-Pong” fashion, the device can produce a 96-watt electrical output with no moving parts. Bearden calls his device a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, or MEG. Jean-Louis Naudin has duplicated Bearden’s device in France. The principles for this type of device were first disclosed by Frank Richardson (USA) in 1978. Troy Reed (USA) has working models of a special magnetized fan that heats up as it spins. It takes exactly the same amount of energy to spin the fan whether it is generating heat or not. Beyond these developments, multiple inventors have identified working mechanisms that produce motor torque from permanent magnets alone. 3) Mechanical Heaters. There are two classes of machines that transform a small amount of mechanical energy into a large amount of heat. The best of these purely mechanical designs are the rotating cylinder systems designed by Frenette (USA) and Perkins (USA). In these machines, one cylinder is rotated within another cylinder with about an eighth of an inch of clearance between them. The space between the cylinders is filled with a liquid such as water or oil, and it is this “working fluid” that heats up as the inner cylinder spins. Another method uses magnets mounted on a wheel to produce large eddy currents in a plate of aluminum, causing the aluminum to heat up rapidly. These magnetic heaters have been demonstrated by Muller (Canada), Adams (NZ) and Reed (USA). All of these systems can produce ten times more heat than standard methods using the same energy input. 4) Super-Efficient Electrolysis. Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true only under the worst case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency, using a system developed by Stan Meyers (USA) and again recently by Xogen Power, Inc., it collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas with very little electrical input. Also, using different electrolytes (additives that make the water conduct electricity better) changes the efficiency of the process dramatically. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make Hydrogen from water for free, forever. 5) Implosion/Vortex. All major industrial engines use the release of heat to cause expansion and pressure to produce work, like in your car engine. Nature uses the opposite process of cooling to cause suction and vacuum to produce work, like in a tornado. Viktor Schauberger (Austria) was the first to build working models of Implosion Engines in the 1930’s and 1940’s. Since that time, Callum Coats has published extensively on Schauberger’s work in his book Living Energies and subsequently, a number of researchers have built working models of Implosion Turbine Engines. These are fuelless engines that produce mechanical work from energy accessed from a vacuum. There are also much simpler designs that use vortex motions to tap a combination of gravity and centrifugal force to produce a continuous motion in fluids. 6) Cold Fusion. In March 1989, two Chemists from Brigham Young University in Utah (USA) announced that they had produced atomic fusion reactions in a simple tabletop device. The claims were “debunked” within 6 months and the public lost interest. Nevertheless, Cold Fusion is very real. Not only has excess heat production been repeatedly documented, but also low energy atomic element transmutation has been catalogued, involving dozens of different reactions! This technology definitely can produce low cost energy and scores of other important industrial processes. 7) Solar Assisted Heat Pumps. The refrigerator in your kitchen is the only “free energy machine” you currently own. It’s an electrically operated heat pump. It uses one amount of energy (electricity) to move three amounts of energy (heat). This gives it a “co-efficient of performance” (COP) of about 3. Your refrigerator uses one amount of electricity to pump three amounts of heat from the inside of the refrigerator to the outside of the refrigerator. This is its typical use, but it is the worst possible way to use the technology. Here’s why. A heat pump pumps heat from the “source” of heat to the “sink” or place that absorbs the heat. The “source” of heat should obviously be HOT and the “sink” for heat should obviously be COLD for this process to work the best. In your refrigerator, it’s exactly the opposite. The “source” of heat is inside the box, which is COLD, and the “sink” for heat is the room temperature air of your kitchen, which is warmer than the source. This is why the COP remains low for your kitchen refrigerator. But this is not true for all heat pumps. COP’s of 8 to 10 are easily attained with solar assisted heat pumps. In such a device, a heat pump draws heat from a solar collector and dumps the heat into a large underground absorber, which remains at 55° F, and mechanical energy is extracted in the transfer. This process is equivalent to a steam engine that extracts mechanical energy between the boiler and the condenser, except that it uses a fluid that “boils” at a much lower temperature than water. One such system that was tested in the 1970’s produced 350 hp, measured on a Dynamometer, in a specially designed engine from just 100-sq. ft. of solar collector. (This is NOT the system promoted by Dennis Lee.) The amount of energy it took to run the compressor (input) was less than 20 hp, so this system produced more than 17 times more energy than it took to keep it going! It could power a small neighborhood from the roof of a hot tub gazebo, using exactly the same technology that keeps the food cold in your kitchen. Currently, there is an industrial scale heat pump system just north of Kona, Hawaii that generates electricity from temperature differences in ocean water. There are dozens of other systems that I have not mentioned, many of them are as viable and well tested as the ones I have just recounted. But this short list is sufficient to make my point: free energy technology is here, now. It offers the world pollution-free, energy abundance for everyone, everywhere. It is now possible to stop the production of “greenhouse gases” and shut down all of the nuclear power plants. We can now desalinate unlimited amounts of seawater at an affordable price, and bring adequate fresh water to even the most remote habitats. Transportation costs and the production costs for just about everything can drop dramatically. Food can even be grown in heated greenhouses in the winter, anywhere. All of these wonderful benefits that can make life on this planet so much easier and better for everyone have been postponed for decades. Why? Whose purposes are served by this postponement? The Invisible Enemy
There are four gigantic forces that have worked together to create this situation. To say that there is, and has been a “conspiracy” to suppress this technology only leads to a superficial understanding of the world, and it places the blame for this completely outside of ourselves. Our willingness to remain ignorant and actionless in the face of this situation has always been interpreted by two of these forces as “implied consent.” So, besides a “non-demanding public,” what are the other three forces that are impeding the availability of free energy technology? In standard economic theory, there are three classes of Industry. These are Capital, Goods, and Services. Within the first class, Capital, there are also three sub-classes. These are: 1) Natural Capital. This relates to raw materials (such as a gold mine) and sources of energy (such as a hydroelectric dam or an oil well). 2) Currency. This relates to the printing of paper “money” and the minting of coins. These functions are usually the job of Government. 3) Credit. This relates to the loaning of money for interest and its extension of economic value through deposit loan accounts. From this, it is easy to see, that energy functions in the economy in the same way as gold, the printing of money by the Government, or the issuing of credit by a bank. In the United States, and in most other countries around the world, there is a “money monopoly” in place. I am “free” to earn as much “money” as I want, but I will only be paid in Federal Reserve Notes. There is nothing I can do to be paid in Gold Certificates, or some other form of “money.” This money monopoly is solely in the hands of a small number of private stock banks, and these banks are owned by the Wealthiest Families in the world. Their plan is to eventually control 100% of all of the Capital resources of the world, and thereby control everyone’s life through the availability (or non-availability) of all goods and services. An independent source of wealth (free energy device) in the hands of each and every person in the world, ruins their plans for world domination, permanently. Why this is true is easy to see. Currently, a nation’s economy can be either slowed down or sped up by the raising or lowering of interest rates. But if an independent source of capital (energy) were present in the economy, and any business or person could raise more capital without borrowing it from a bank, this centralized throttling action on interest rates would simply not have the same effect. Free energy technology changes the value of money. The Wealthiest Families and the Issuers of Credit do not want any competition. It’s that simple. They want to maintain their current monopoly control of the money supply. For them, free energy technology is not just something to suppress, it must be PERMANENTLY FORBIDDEN! So, the Wealthiest Families and their Central Banking institutions are the First Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are the imagined “divine right to rule”, greed, and their insatiable need to control everything except themselves. The weapons they have used to enforce this postponement include intimidation, “expert” debunkers, buying and shelving of technology, murder and attempted murder of the inventors, character assassination, arson, and a wide variety of financial incentives and disincentives to manipulate possible supporters. They have also promoted the general acceptance of a scientific theory that states that free energy is impossible (Laws of Thermodynamics). The Second Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is National Governments. The problem here is not so much related to competition in the printing of currency, but in the maintenance of National Security. The fact is, the world out there is a jungle, and humans can be counted upon to be very cruel, dishonest, and sneaky. It is Government’s job to “provide for the common defense.” For this, “police powers” are delegated by the Executive Branch of Government to enforce “the rule of law.” Most of us who consent to the rule of law do so because we believe it is the right thing to do, for our own benefit. There are always a few individuals, however, that believe that their own benefit is best served by behavior that does not voluntarily conform to the generally agreed upon social order. These people choose to operate outside of “the rule of law” and are considered outlaws, criminals, subversives, traitors, revolutionaries, or terrorists. Most National Governments have discovered, by trial and error, that the only Foreign Policy that really works, over time, is a policy called “Tit for Tat.” What this means to you and me is, that governments treat each other the way they are being treated. There is a constant “jockeying” for position and influence in world affairs, and the STRONGEST party wins! In economics, it’s the Golden Rule, which states: “The one with the Gold makes the Rules.” So it is with politics also, but its appearance is more Darwinian. It’s simply “survival of the fittest.” In politics, however, the “fittest” has come to mean the strongest party who is also willing to fight the dirtiest. Absolutely every means available is used to maintain an advantage over the “adversary”, and everyone else is the “adversary” regardless of whether they are considered friend or foe. This includes outrageous psychological posturing, lying, cheating, spying, stealing, assassination of world leaders, proxy wars, alliances and shifting alliances, treaties, foreign aid, and the presence of military forces wherever possible. Like it or not, this IS the psychological and actual arena National Governments operate in. No National Government will ever do anything that simply gives an adversary an advantage for free. NEVER! It’s national suicide. Any activity by any individual, inside or outside the country, that is interpreted as giving an adversary an edge or advantage, in any way, will be deemed a threat to “National Security.” ALWAYS! Free energy technology is a National Government’s worst nightmare! Openly acknowledged, free energy technology sparks an unlimited arms race by all governments in a final attempt to gain absolute advantage and domination. Think about it- Do you think Japan will not feel intimidated if China gets free energy? Do you think Israel will sit by quietly as Iraq acquires free energy? Do you think India will allow Pakistan to develop free energy? Do you think the USA would not try to stop Osama bin Laden from getting free energy? Unlimited energy available to the current state of affairs on this planet leads to an inevitable reshuffling of the “balance of power.” This could become an all-out war to prevent “the other” from having the advantage of unlimited wealth and power. Everybody will want it, and at the same time, want to prevent everyone else from getting it. So, National Governments are the Second Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are “self-preservation.” This self-preservation operates on three levels. First, by not giving undue advantage to an external enemy. Second, by preventing individualized action capable of effectively challenging official police powers (anarchy) within the country. And third, by preserving income streams derived from taxing energy sources currently in use. Their weapons include the preventing of the issuance of patents based on National Security grounds, the legal and illegal harassment of inventors with criminal charges, tax audits, threats, phone taps, arrest, arson, theft of property during shipment, and a host of other intimidations which make the business of building and marketing a free energy machine impossible. The Third Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology consists of the group of deluded inventors and out right charlatans and con men. On the periphery of the extraordinary scientific breakthroughs that constitute the real free energy technologies, lies a shadow world of unexplained anomalies, marginal inventions and unscrupulous promoters. The first two Forces have constantly used the media to promote the worst examples of this group, to distract the public’s attention and to discredit the real breakthroughs by associating them with the obvious frauds. Over the last hundred years, dozens of stories have surfaced about unusual inventions. Some of these ideas have so captivated the public’s imagination that a mythology about these systems continues to this day. Names like Keely, Hubbard, Coler, and Henderschott immediately come to mind. There may be real technologies behind these names, but there simply isn’t enough technical data available in the public domain to make a determination. These names remain associated with a free energy mythology, however, and are sited by debunkers as examples of fraud. The idea of free energy taps very deeply into the human subconscious mind. A few inventors with marginal technologies that demonstrate useful anomalies have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of their inventions. Some of these inventors also have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of THEMSELVES for having invented it. A combination of “gold fever” and/or a “messiah complex” appears, wholly distorting any future contribution they may make. While the research thread they are following may hold great promise, they begin to trade enthusiasm for facts, and the value of the scientific work from that point on suffers greatly. There is a powerful, yet subtle seduction that can warp a personality if they believe that “the world rests on their shoulders” or that they are the world’s “savior.” Strange things also happen to people when they think they are about to become extremely rich. It takes a tremendous spiritual discipline to remain objective and humble in the presence of a working free energy machine. Many inventors’ psyches become unstable just BELIEVING they have a free energy machine. As the quality of the science deteriorates, some inventors also develop a “persecution complex” that makes them very defensive and unapproachable. This process precludes them from ever really developing a free energy machine, and fuels the fraud mythologies tremendously. Then there are the out right con men. In the last 15 years, there is one person in the USA who has raised the free energy con to a professional art. He has raised more than $100,000,000, has been barred from doing business in the State of Washington, has been jailed in California, and he’s still at it. He always talks about a variation of one of the real free energy systems, sells people on the idea that they will get one of these systems soon, but ultimately sells them only promotional information which gives no real data about the energy system itself. He has mercilessly preyed upon the Christian Community and the Patriot Community in the USA, and is still going strong. His current scam involves signing up hundreds of thousands of people as locations where he will install a free energy machine. In exchange for letting him put the FE generator in their home, they will get free electricity for life, and his company will sell the excess energy back to the local utility company. After becoming convinced that they will receive free electricity for life, with no out-front expenses, they gladly buy a video that helps draw their friends into the scam as well. Once you understand the power and motivations of the first two Forces I have discussed, its obvious that this person’s current “business plan” cannot be implemented. This one person has probably done more harm to the free energy movement in the USA than any other Force, by destroying people’s trust in the technology.
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 28, 2007 10:22:10 GMT 2
bump, tämä topikki ansaitsee päästä uusimmaksi koska päivitin tähän loput tekstistä , hyvää juttua...
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Feb 8, 2007 14:24:36 GMT 2
Tämä kyseinen teksti osoitteesta merlib.org/node/1597 jossa kyseisessä tekstissä on useita linkkejä monien sanojen takana joten kannattaa lukea suoraan sieltä... teksti on alunperin osoitteesta; guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/juttu/kvantti/index.html Käytämmekö tulevaisuudessa ilmaista energiaa?
Kvanttienergia on uusi tapa lypsää atomia Teksti ja kuvat: Juha Hartikka, DI Energia-alalta tihkuu kummia pikku-uutisia. Jos kehittelyn alla olevat energiatekniikat osoittautuvat käytännössä toimiviksi, ne tulevat olemaan käänteentekeviä sekä ympäristömme että energian edullisuuden kannalta ja lisäksi kaikkien ulottuvilla. Miltä tuntuisi vaikkapa oma pieni voimala, joka tuottaisi ilmaiseksi energiaa talon lämmitykseen? Tai että auto kulkisi tankkaamatta ja saastuttamatta? Kuva: Uudet energiatekniikat ovat osoittautuneet erittäin lupaaviksi mm vetytekniikkaan sovellettuina. Tämän puhtaan ja uusiutuvan energiamuodon taloudelliseen tuottamiseen on jo useita kokeellisia sovellutuksia. Kanadalainen kirjailija Jeane Manning johdattelee Weinfeldenin konferenssin kuulijoita edullisen vedyn tuotannon uusimpiin kuulumisiin. Tyhjöenergia, nollapiste-energia, vapaaenergia, kvanttienergia - miten vain, kukin tutkija käyttää sopivaa nimeä energiasovellutuksensa toteutustavasta riippuen. Tutkimustyötä tuontienergiasta riippumattomien uusiutuvien energialähteiden kehittämiseksi harrastetaan valtion tuella mm. Japanissa, Intiassa sekä Venäjällä . Kehittyneen energianjakelun maissa Pohjois- ja Etelä-Amerikassa sekä Euroopassa taas tutkimus on pääasiassa yksityisten vastuulla. Alan keksintöjä tunnetaan jo kymmenittäin. Eräs Japanin kvanttienergiatutkijoita on Dr. Shiuji Inomata Tsukubassa. Hän toimii valtion palveluksessa kehittäen Dr. Bruce de Palman esittelemää unipolaarigeneraattoria, joka juontaa juurensa klassisesta Faradayn kiekosta. Intiassa vastaavaa tutkimusta tekee Parahamsa Tewari, B.Sc. Ranskassa vapaaenergiaa tekee tunnetuksi Jean-Louis Naudin ja Brasiliassa prof. Fran De Aquino. USA:n kvanttienergiatutkimuksen puolestapuhujia ovat mm. Thomas Bearden, Ltn.Col. ja Brian O'Leary, Ph.D. Ken Shoulders, Ph.D., tutkii USA:ssa mikroskooppisia varausklustereita, jotka näyttävät tuottavan hajotessaan yli kolmekymmentä kertaa enemmän energiaa kuin niiden aikaansaamiseen tarvitaan. Wingate Lambertson, Ph.D., kerää tyhjöenergiaa WIN-laitteen, keraamin ja metallin seoksesta (Cermet) tehdyn elementin avulla. Kanadalainen John Hutchison on rakennellut vapaaenergiaparistoja kvartsikiekoista. Joseph Newman on jo kahden vuosikymmenen ajan hämmästyttänyt amerikkalaisia generaattorillaan, joka tiettävästi antaa energiaa ulos noin kahdeksan kertaa niin paljon kuin sen pyörittämiseen tarvitaan. Paul Baumannin Testatika -generaattori jauhaa sähköä sveitsiläisen Methernitha-yhteisön omaan käyttöön. Lähes vuosisataiset juuret Aivan äskeisiä keksintöjä eivät tyhjöenergialaitteet ole. Nikola Teslaa (1856-1943), vuosisadan vaihteen sähköneroa saamme kiittää paitsi nykyisestä kolmevaihevirtajärjestelmästämme sähköverkkoineen, moottoreineen ja generaattoreineen, myös monista radioviestinnän peruskeksinnöistä. Häntä pidetään myös tyhjöenergian kehittämisen isänä. Muita varhaisia pioneereja olivat John Keely (1827-1898) värähtelymoottoreineen Philadelphiassa sekä Walter Russell (1871-1963) vedyntuotantokeksintöineen ja vapaaenergiageneraattoreineen. Thomas Henry Moray (1892-1974) kehitti elektronisen vapaaenergialaitteen ja Lester Hendershot (1898-1961) sähköisen vapaaenergiaoskillaattorin. Brittikeksijä John Searl keksi 50-luvulla SEG-laitteen, jonka kehittämistä jatkaa nykyään innokas kansainvälinen kokeilijapiiri. Thomas Townsend Brown tutki samoihin aikoihin voimakkaiden sähkökenttien ja gravitaation yhteyttä. Tulokset tunnetaan nykyään Biefeld-Brown -efektin nimellä. "I have a Dream..." Prof. John R. R. Searl ja hänen haaveensa, levity disc (levitaatiokiekko). Brittikeksijä Searl aloitti antigravitaatiokokeilunsa pyöriviin magneettirulliin perustuvilla levitaatiokiekoilla jo 1970-luvulla. Hänen kertomiinsa tuloksiin ei juurikaan uskottu, koska niitä ei voitu selittää yleisesti hyväksyttyjen teorioiden avulla. Venäläiset akateemiset tutkijat Roschin ja Godin olivat tiettävästi ensimmäiset, jotka Searlin jälkeen kokeilivat vastaavaa laitetta. Tulokset olivat hyvin samansuuntaisia, mikä tietenkin asettaa Searlin väitteet uuteen valoon. Kvanttienergia - arvoituksellisuudessaan niin viehättävä! Mistä tämä energia sitten tulee? Tämä onkin vaikein kysymys, koska teoriat eivät vielä ole kokeellisen tutkimuksen havaintojen tasalla. Kesäkuussa 2001 alan huippufyysikoita kokoontui luennoimaan tutkimustensa tuloksista Sveitsin Weinfeldeniin. Tästä konferenssista haimme tähän asti tuoreinta tietoa alan kehityksestä. Konferenssin luennot on julkaistu kaksikielisessä raportissa "Neue Wasserstofftechnologien und Raumantriebe". Professori Philipp M. Kanarev Krasnodarista luennoi vedenhajotuskokeistaan, joissa syntyvä vety- ja hukkalämpömäärä yhdessä ylitti moninkertaisesti käytetyn sähköenergian määrän. Kokeellisten tulosten tukena olivat kemian lähdeteosten taulukoista lasketut hyötysuhteet, jotka pitivät yhtä käytännön kokeiden kanssa. "Ilmiön syyt ovat vaikeita selittää", toteaa Kanarev yksinkertaisesti, "mutta jos elektronilta riistetään energiaa eli massaa, se näyttää korvaavan vajeen ottamalla energiaa ympäristöstään." Miksei ilmiötä ole sitten aikaisemmin huomattu? Itse asiassa se on huomattu, mutta koska se näyttää rikkovan energian säilymisen lakia, se on yleensä sivuutettu hankalana asiana nykyisille teorioille. Professorit Philipp M. Kanarev (yllä vasemmalla) ja Athanassios A. Nassikas valmistautumassa Weinfeldenin konferenssiin. Prof. Kanarev on kehittänyt uudet, erittäin tarkat mallit fotonista ja elektronista, joita hän kuvaa kirjoissaan. Hän käsittelee niissä myös tarvetta uudistaa fysiikkaa. Myös prof. Nassikas sivusi luennossaan fysiikan ristiriitoja ja muutosvastarintaa. Hän totesi: "Tämän hetken fysiikan ongelmat eivät liity tekniikkaan. Ne ovat filosofisia". Professori A. A. Nassikas Ateenasta selitti kvanttienergiailmiötä luennossaan kertomalla protonia lähestyvän elektronin muuttavan ympäristön gravitaatioenergiaa sähkömagneetiseksi energiaksi. Nassikas nimitti ilmiötä nimellä "aika-avaruus-energiapumppu"(Space-Time Energy Pump). Pariisin yliopiston professori Jean-Pierre Vigier taas selitti luennossaan energian syntytavaksi elektronin spin- eli pyörimisliikemuunnokset. Amerikkalainen Tri Paul LaViolette osoitti Subquantum Kinetics -teoriansa pohjalta ilmiöiden yhteyksiä gravitaatioon eli painovoimaan selittäen Brown-Biefeld-efektiä sekä Moskovan tiedeakatemian tutkijoiden Roschinin ja Godinin Searl-tyyppisen MEC-koelaitteen painonpudotusta. Luennoijat näyttävät siis viittaavan esityksisään samaan suuntaan - elektronin ja atomiytimen vuorovaikutukseen. Kvanttienergia ei kuitenkaan ole totuttua kemiallista energiaa. Koska atomiakaan tarvitse särkeä, ydinenergiastakaan ei ole kyse. Mitä se sitten on? Prof. Vigierin sanoja lainaten kyseessä on "New Source of Energy" - täysin uusi energialähde. guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/juttu/kvantti/031VigierandManning.JPG[/img] Tunnettu suhteellisuusteoreetikko, Pariisin yliopiston professori Jean-Pierre Vigier tapasi suositun kanadalaisen kirjailijan Jeane Manningin Weinfeldenin energiakonferenssissa. Vigier on pitkän uransa aikana työskennellyt mm. tieteen historian suuruuksien Frédéric Joliot-Curien ja Louis de Broglien kanssa. Aikoinaan itse Albert Einstein pyysi häntä assistentikseen Princetoniin, mutta Vigierin silloinen työnantaja Ranskan valtio halusi pitää ydintutkijan kylmän sodan pyörteissä itsellään ja esti lupaavan yhteistyön eväämällä Vigierin viisumin. Tällä hetkellä Vigier tutkii kvanttienergiaa yhdessä Belgradin yliopiston professori Z. Maritin kanssa. Jeane Manning taas tunnetaan parhaiten kirjastaan "The Coming Energy Revolution." Motivaatiokseen kirjoittaa puhtaasta, uusiutuvasta energiasta hän mainitsee yksinkertaisesti: "Kolme lastani." Professorit Nassikas, Kanarev ja Vigier selittivät takavuosien tieteellisen sensaation, ns. kylmäfuusion itse asiassa kuuluvan kvanttienergiailmiöiden piiriin. Löytäjät Pons ja Fleischmann tulkitsivat ilmiön alkuun virheellisesti atomiytimien yhtymisestä eli fuusiosta syntyväksi ydinenergiaksi, mikä aiheutti melkoista sekaannusta reaktion tutkimisessa. Ottaen huomioon kvanttienergian puhtauden ja loputtoman uusiutuvuuden, tapaus kuulostaa aivan samanlaiselta kuin kullanetsijät olisivatkin vahingossa löytäneet timantteja... Amerikkalainen tri Paul La Violette selitti Searlin, Godinin ja Roschinin antigravitaatiohavaintoja kehittämänsä Subquantum kinetics -teorian pohjalta. La Violette kertoi luennossaan tulkintojaan mm. elektrogravitaatiosta mahdollisena lentolaitteiden käyttövoimana sekä varhaisempien tutkijoiden, kuten Thomas Townsend Brownin antigravitaatiokokeista (Biefeld-Brown effect). La Violetten kirjoista ja teorioista lisää nettisivulla www.etheric.comTaustatukea kirjallisuudesta Tunnettu amerikkalainen tutkija tri Harold Puthoff tuumii, että elektroni ammentaa atomiytimen ympäri pyörimiseen tarvitsemansa energian imemällä jatkuvasti ns. nollapiste-energiaa. Kvanttimekaniikkahan väittää, että elektronilla on oltava käytössään tietty perusenergia. Puthoff huomauttaa myös, että Einsteinin kuuluisan energian ja massan yhteyden (E = mc2) mukaan tyhjöenergiasta täytyy pystyä muodostumaan hiukkasia. Kvanttimekaniikan mukaan näin tapahtuukin. Kuuluisa brittifyysikko, Cambridgen professori Stephen W. Hawking kuvailee suositussa kirjassaan "Ajan lyhyt historia" mustan aukon säteilyä, joka syntyy kvanttiheilahtelu-ilmiöstä. Kvanttiheilahtelu tarkoittaa sitä, että hiukkasia ja antihiukkasia syntyy jatkuvasti tyhjässä avaruudessakin. Normaalisti ne neutraloivat toisensa kadoten lähes välittömästi, mutta mustan aukon tapahtumahorisontin välittömässä läheisyydessä voi Hawkingin mukaan tapahtuakin niin, että aukko nielaiseen valtavalla painovoimallaan juuri syntyneen antihiukkasen, jolla oletetaan olevan negatiivista energiaa. Antihiukkasen parina syntynyt hiukkanen vapautuukin nyt ympäristöön positiivisine energioineen. Voidaan siis sanoa, että musta aukko säteilee kvanttienergiaa ympäristöönsä. Hawkingin mukaan tämä mustan aukon sivutuotteena syntyvä energia ei riko energian säilymisen periaatetta, koska syntyvien energioiden summa on edelleen sama. Koska antihiukkasella oletetaan olevan negatiivista energiaa, sen nielaistessaan musta aukko menettää hieman omaa energiaansa eli massaansa. Jos nyt ajattelemme, missä muualla kuin mustassa aukossa löydämme yhtä vahvoja voimien vuorovaikutuksia, väistämättä mieleemme tulee atomi ytimineen ja elektroneineen. Muistellaanpa nyt, mitä Weinfeldenin luennoijat kertoivat protoneista ja elektroneista? Näyttää tosiaan siltä, että jostain atomin sisältä löytyy meitä hyödyttävä energiareikä... Silti kvanttienergiankin kattava "kaiken teoria" siis vielä haussa. Yrityksiä siihen on tosin jo ollutkin. Itse Einsteinin aikoinaan kehittelemä yhtenäisvoimateoria jäi häneltä aikoinaan keskeneräiseksi. Viimeaikaiset havainnot näyttävät kuitenkin viittaavan gravitaation ja sähkömagneettisten voimien yhdistyvän hyvin voimakkaissa sähkömagneettisissä kentissä. Mm. brasilialainen professori Fran De Aquino on jo esittänyt oman mallinsa yhtenäisvoimateoriaksi. Professori Kanarev käsittelee kirjassaan "The Crisis of the Theoretical Physics" johtamiaan uusia fotonin ja elektronin malleja, jotka osaltaan poistavat kvanttimekaniikassa tähän asti vallinneen epätarkkuuden. Hiukkasfyysikoiden päämääränä näyttää olevan suuren yhtenäisvoimateorian luominen. Olemme siis matkalla kohti ilmiön ymmärtämistä. Toimii kierrätysenergialla On edullisempaa käyttää olemassaolevaa energiaa kuin yrittää tehdä kokonaan uutta. Kvanttienergia otetaan talteen itse hiukkasmaailman kudoksesta ja sen energiavirroista ikään kuin vesipyörä kerää energiaa juoksevasta vedestä. Tutusta nykytekniikasta kvanttienergialaitteita muistuttavat lähinnä jääkaappi, ilmastointi ja lämpöpumppu. Esimerkiksi talon lämmitykseen käytettävä lämpöpumppu tuo nautittavaksemme lämpöenergiaa parhaimmillaan kolme kertaa niin paljon kuin se raksuttaa kilowattitunteja sähkömittariimme. Sen terminen hyötysuhde on enemmän kuin yksi, eli kyseessä on eräänlainen "overunity device". Lämpöpumppu tai jääkaappi eivät nykäise lämpöä tyhjästä, vaan ne todellakin pumppaavat sitä paikasta toiseen. Samaan tapaan toimivat varsinaiset kvanttienergialaitteet, ne vain toimivat hiukkastasolla. Pienellä käyttövoimalla saadaan talteen moninkertainen energia. Ja mikä parasta, energiaa saadakseen ei tarvitse polttaa mitään enempää kuin halkaista atomejakaan. Kvanttienergialaite ei siis savuta eikä säteile ainakaan auringonvaloa haitallisemmin. Kaiken päälle se on tiettävästi rajattomasti uusiutuva. Periaate ei aseta rajoja sovellutuksen koolle. Laite on kehitettävissä riittävän pienikokoiseksi vaikkapa auton, lentokoneen tai mopon moottoriksi tai omakotitalon yksityiseksi sähkövoimalaksi. Parhaimmillaan se pystyy vapauttamaan kotitaloudet sähkölinjoista ja autot bensaletkun päästä sekä valtiot kivihiili- ja öljyriippuvuudesta. Jälkimmäisen seikan sivuvaikutukset tosin moni vapaaenergiakeksijä on jo saanut huomata työssään. Kuningas Öljy ei ole juuri osoittanut kokeilijoille suosiotaan. Kun Tesla aikoinaan ilmoitti aikovansa valjastaa kaikkien ihmisten käyttöön universumistamme vapaasti saatavaa energiaa, yleisön ihailu muuttui kummeksumiseksi ja yksityiset rahoittajat vetivät tukensa pois. Henry Morayn laboratorioon taas murtauduttiin useita kertoja ja häntä perheineen uhkailtiin ja painostettiin. Hendershot-laite sai aluksi innostuneen vastaanoton, kunnes eräät tiedepiirit ottivat asiakseen keksinnön naurunalaiseksi saattamisen. Lopulta eräs yritys maksoi Hendershotille saadakseen hänet lopettamaan laitteensa kehittämisen. John Searl sähköisti talonsa SEG -vapaaenergiageneraattorillaan. Juhlituksi tulemisen sijasta hän joutui syytteeseen laittomasta sähkön tuotannosta ja tuomittiin Englannin energialain nojalla vankeuteen. Vapaaksi päästyään hän sai havaita mallikappaleet ja muistiinpanonsa hävitetyiksi. Searl ei enää saanut kokoon rahoitusta uusille energiakokeiluille, mutta jatkaa toimintaansa luennoimalla kokemuksistaan. Prof. John Searlin SEG-vapaaenergiageneraattorin perusosien tietokonemallinnus. Searl Effect Generator:issa on kolme sisäkkäistä rengasmaista akselinsa suuntaan magnetoitua kiintomagneettia. Näiden ulkokehillä kiertävät rullamaiset pienet magneetit joiden magneettikenttä on kehiin nähden vastakkaissuuntainen. Näin siis samansuuntaiset magneettirullat hylkivät ja säilyttävät vakioetäisyyden toisiinsa, samalla kun kehien vastakkaissuuntainen magneettikenttä vetää puoleensa ja pitää ne ympärillään. Käynnistyttyään ulommat rullat kiertävät keksijän kertoman mukaan kehäänsä 2,5 -kertaisella vakionopeudella kuhunkin sisempään rullastoon verrattuna. Sähköteho kerätään talteen ulommaisten magneettien ympärillä näkyvillä C-mallisilla käämeillä. Ilman näitä käämejä laitteen kuvataan toimivan korkeajännitelähteenä, koska pyörivät magneettirullat pumppaavat elektroneja laitteen keskeltä sen ulkokehälle. Laite näyttäisi siis olevan eräänlainen magneettilaakeroitu elektronilinko. Yksinkertaisimmillaan SEG:tä on kokeiltu yhdellä renkaalla rullineen. Moskovan tiedeakatemian tutkijat Godin ja Roschin raportoivat saavuttaneensa yksikehäisellä MEC-koelaitteellaan yli 30% painonpudotuksen. Kuva: John A. Thomas Jr., www.searleffect.com . Lisätietoja: www.sisrc.com . Ilmainenkaan ei tule tyhjästä Kvanttienergia itse voi olla ilmaista, mutta sen tuottamiseen tarvittavien laitteiden markkinointivalmiiksi kehittäminen ei sitä ole. Kvanttienergiaa on kuitenkin ainakin tutkijoiden käsityksen mukaan saatavissa yhtä helposti kaikkialla, joten mahdollisesti toteutuessaan se voi lopultakin vapauttaa ihmisen polttoaineen mukanakuljettamisen orjuudesta ja auttaa alikehittyneiden maiden omavaraistamisessa paikallisen, puhtaan energiatuotannon avulla. Keksiminen on kuitenkin helpompaa kuin keksinnön hyväksyminen. Aivan eri asia onkin, milloin käyttäjät omaksuvat tällaisen aivan uuden ja oudon energiantuotantomenetelmän. Mahdollisen ilmaisen energian käyttö edellyttää melkoista muutosta kulttuurissamme ja omassa suhtautumisessamme. Koko tähänastisen historiamme aikana yhtä perustavanlaatuisten muutosten omaksumiseen on kulunut sukupolvia. Mikään ei osoita, että nykyihminen toimisi päätöksenteossaan oleellisesti eri tavalla kuin esi-isänsä. Kuluttaja odottaa, että joku tarjoaa hänelle uutta tuotetta mukavasti postimyynnistä, samalla kun hän naureskelee höyrähtäneille keksijöille. Keksijä taas uskoo lujasti keksintöönsä ja odottaa, että innostuneet käyttäjät ja rahoittajat parveilevat kiitollisina hänen ympärillään auttaakseen jatkokehittelyssä ja napatakseen hänen luomuksensa suoraan käsistä. Päättäjä taas odottaa jonkun muun tekevän jotain tai ottavan edes vastuun toimeksiannon antamisesta. Näin siis kuluttaja odottaa ja lopulta unohtaa, keksijä nolataan kiitoksen sijasta, ja virkamies välttyy tekemästä virheitä koska ei tee mitään. Moskovan tiedeakatemian tutkijat Godin ja Roschin olivat tiettävästi ensimmäiset, jotka toistivat Searlin kokeet omalla, hieman alkuperäisestä SEG:stä muunnellulla Magnetic Energy Converter (MEC) -laitteellaan. Tämä on yhdellä magneettirullastolla varustettu Searl-kiekko, jonka rullia pyöritetään sähkömoottorilla. Tutkijat raportoivat yli kolmenkymmenen prosentin painonpudotuksen koelaitteessa. Toisinpäin pyöritettäessä laitteen paino vastaavasti lisääntyi. Muita havaittuja efektejä olivat käynnistetyn laitteen ympärillä pimeässä näkyvä sinipunainen koronakiekko sekä ilman lämpötilan putoaminen noin kuudella asteella laitteen välittömässä läheisyydessä. Sergei M. Godin kuvassa oikealla ja Weinfeldenin konferenssin organisoija Adolf Schneider kääntämässä luentoa saksaksi kuvassa vasemmalla. Lisätietoja MEC-koelaitteesta löytyy nettisivulta www.alexfrolov.narod.ru/russearl.htmlMilloin kvanttienergiaa tänne Pohjolaan? Yritysten mielenkiinto kvanttienergiatutkimusta kohtaan on heräämässä ja tietoa haetaan parhaillaan maailmalta. Kotimaisissa opinahjoissa aiheesta sensijaan tiedetään vielä tuskin mitään, senverran hitaasti kvanttimekaniikan huippututkimuksen uusimmat tuulahdukset tänne asti ehtivät. Koulutettua työvoimaa alan tutkimukseen ei siis ole yliopistoistamme odotettavissa tällä vuosikymmenellä, vaan kehityksen vetovastuu jäänee edelleen yrityksille. Sinällään kvanttienergialla on onnistuessaan kaikki edellytykset nousta sukupolven kuluessa kansallisena työllistäjänä Nokiaan verrattavaksi teollisuudenhaaraksi, koska käytännön sovellutukset ovat huomattavasti yksinkertaisempia kuin teoria niiden takana. Eri asia onkin, riittääkö yliopistomaailmassa uskallusta lahteä mukaan sellaisen energiatekniikan kehittämiseen, joka kilpailee maailman energiatuotannon mahtitekijöiden kanssa. Tämähän saattaisi merkitä omien energiatutkimusmäärärahojen vaarantamista. Elämmekö mullistusten aikaa itse sitä huomaamatta? Galilei, Newton, Darwin, Einstein. Heistä ja monista muista uranuurtajista aluksi vaiettiin, sitten heidät haukuttiin mahdottomien ja sopimattomien ajatusten vuoksi. Lopulta läpi lyötyäänkin tieteellinen teoria on loppujen lopuksi vain malli, joka likipitäen kuvaa todellisuutta. Jotkut paremmin, toiset huonommin, täydellisesti tuskin mikään. Luonto toimii kuitenkin ihmisen teorioista välittämättä. Luovat mielet huomaavat nämä erot teorian ja käytännön välillä. Harvat vain uskaltavat niistä puhua syrjityksi tulemisen pelossa. Suomalaiset vapaaenergiaharrastajatkin välttävät julkisuudessa esiintymistä, etteivät joutuisi leimatuiksi höyrähtäneiksi. Tuskin milloinkaan on energiatekniikassa tapahtunut näin paljon näin vaivihkaa. Puhtaan ja edullisen energian ongelman ratkaisseet nerot ovat ehkä jo keskuudessamme. Olemmeko me juuri niitä, jotka heille nauravat? Jos nämä uudet tekniikat osoittautuvat todella toimiviksi, niiden voidaan odottaa todella muuttavan ihmiskuntaa ja maailmaa - toivottavasti puhtaaseen ja kestävään suuntaan. Tähän päivään asti olemme vain keräilleet maailmankaikkeuden valtavan energiameren rannalle huuhtoutuneita tähteitä. Hyvin hiljalleen on käsityskyvyllemme nyt avautumassa oman avaruutemme ulapan käsittämättömät energiarikkaudet. Uusi energiatutkimus näyttää tarjoavan käyttöömme jotain vastaavaa kuin vene ja verkot olivat aikaisemmin meren tuomia hylkytavarakasoja kolunneille esivanhemmillemme. Onko meillä uskallusta nousta tähän veneeseen ja heittää verkkomme Energian mereen? Nettisivuja: Weinfeldenin energiakonferenssi, Weinfelden.innoplaza.net Experimental Energy Links, energy.innoplaza.net Prof. Kanarev and his books, Kanarev.innoplaza.net Tom Van Flandern about superluminal speed of gravity, www.ldolphin.org/vanFlandern/gravityspeed.html Kommentteja Roschinin ja Godinin MEC-kokeesta: Strange Effects Related to Rotating Magnetic Systems, kirjoittaja Matti Pitkänen. Artikkeli julkaistu New Energy Technologies -lehdessä. Kirjallisuutta: Jeane Manning: The Coming Energy Revolution. Yleistajuinen kirja vapaaenergiasta, sen kehittäjistä ja merkityksestä. Avery, New York 1996, ISBN 0-89529-713-2. "Neue Wasserstofftechnologien und Raumantriebe". The Weinfelden energy conference report in English/German. 226 pages, ISBN-3-906571-20-3, e-mail: adolf.schneider@datacomm.ch . Prof. Philipp M. Kanarev: The Crisis of the Theoretical Physics. Fotonin ja elektronin uudet mallit. Krasnodar 1997, in English. Kanarev.innoplaza.net . Prof. Fran De Aquino: Gravitation and Electromagnetism: Correlation and Grand Unification, Los Alamos National Laboratory, preprint no.gr-qc/9910036. Margaret Cheney: Man Out of Time. Nikola Teslan elämäkerta. www.nickf.com/tesla.htm . Juha Hartikka, M.Sc.Tech.
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Oct 31, 2006 18:28:14 GMT 2
.......... www.equilibrauk.com/ ,,, i read this one article, not yet finished reading it but post the link here because it is interesting,, telling about ..... ohhh,, you read,, ... www.equilibrauk.com/shop5.shtml-----------------------------------------
|
|
|
Post by jukka on Nov 24, 2006 13:26:43 GMT 2
By Chris Thomas Jul 09, 2006 The Epoch Times New Zealand Staff Dr Emoto's original and groundbreaking research reveals that water is deeply connected to our individual and collective consciousness. His discoveries are becoming well known around the world, particularly after featuring in the documentary "What the bleep do we know?" His experiments include photographing differences between water crystals after attaching different word labels to identical bottles of water, playing different types of music to water, sending good and bad thoughts towards water, and showing images to water, has revealed that water has life, memory, and intelligence. The experiments also show that water responds positively to moral messages by becoming clear, and negatively to immoral messages by becoming dirty. Last weeks show in Wellington sold out over two weeks in advance and was a huge success. Humour was combined with interesting discoveries and theories that had the crowd's deep attention. Dr Emoto showed images of water crystals from around the world, including one of a freshwater crystal from Petone that was very beautiful. Dr Emoto, who describes himself as an "original thinker" rather than a scientist explains how we can better care for, and improve our current water supplies, "If we can show our love and gratitude to water, it will become more beautiful and pure. I think if each one of us on earth can do this, we won't need any chemical treatment or other purification for water." And if you think that sounds a bit far-fetched, he has plenty of photographic evidence to prove it. The seminar at Paramount Theatre was a visual symphony with Dr Emoto's images of water experiments using sound, words, and pictures; and he shared explanations and concepts around energy and vibration. He postulated that water is the best conductor of vibration, and without vibration there is no life. He demonstrated that the similarity between substances of the same vibration meant they can give energy to each other. He showed this by striking one of two identical tuning forks. He then silenced the struck fork to show that the untouched fork was now vibrating strongly and had received energy. He spoke that this was only one particular vibrating frequency, and he believes humans cover all frequencies in this world, meaning human vibrations can influence all vibrations in this world. He also believes the dissimilarity in the vibrations of people today is manifested in the current sickness of the earth. "Water is the mirror of our hearts," he said. "The new age movement has been around for a while, but there has never been something tangible for people to look into, and the shift from materialism towards spirituality has not moved too well. Yet, something as tangible as water crystals can help people move in the right direction." Dr Emoto, aged 63 years, hails from Yokohama, Japan. As a university graduate he established the International Health Management (IHM) Corporation in 1986, and became a certified doctor of alternative medicine in 1992. He was introduced to the concept of micro cluster water in the US, and Magnetic Resonance Analysis technology. Dr Emoto then began his extensive research into the mysteries of water, and discovered mirco-water crystal photography. He is also the author of the best-selling books: Messages from Water, The Hidden Messages in Water, and The True Power of Water. Dr Emoto also revealed his plan to distribute to schools worldwide 6 million free copies of a book he has written to educate children about the importance of water. For more information about Dr Emoto please visit: www.hado.net . this text from; merlib.org/node/4259
|
|